University of Missouri.
University of Missouri.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2016 Feb;108(1):54-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2015.12.008.
Numerous interventions have been tested to increase physical activity (PA) among minority adults, and several review papers have examined the results from these studies. The primary purpose of this umbrella review is to summarize evidence from existing reviews regarding effectiveness of PA interventions in minority populations.
Searches were conducted in five electronic databases to identify English-language articles reviewing the effects of interventions to increase PA in minority adults living in the United States. Reviews that met the inclusion criteria were critically assessed using umbrella review procedures. Review quality was assessed using the PRISMA statement and checklist.
Twenty-two reviews fulfilled inclusion criteria. The sample included one meta-analysis, 11 integrated reviews, and 10 narrative reviews published between 1998 and 2012. The reviews documented modest improvements in PA with considerable variation in intervention effectiveness across primary studies. Integrative reviews generally were of higher overall quality than narrative reviews with regard to fulfilling PRISMA criteria.
Integrated and narrative reviews were unable to validly determine the characteristics of effective interventions. Future reviews should employ meta-analytic methods in order to quantitatively identify those intervention characteristics that are most likely to increase PA behavior in minority adults.
已经有许多干预措施被测试用于增加少数族裔成年人的身体活动(PA),并且有几篇综述论文已经检验了这些研究的结果。本伞式综述的主要目的是总结现有综述中关于针对美国少数族裔人群的 PA 干预措施有效性的证据。
在五个电子数据库中进行检索,以确定综述了增加生活在美国的少数族裔成年人身体活动的干预措施效果的英文文献。符合纳入标准的综述文章使用伞式综述程序进行了批判性评估。使用 PRISMA 声明和检查表评估综述质量。
有 22 篇综述符合纳入标准。样本包括一篇荟萃分析、11 篇综合综述和 10 篇叙述性综述,发表时间在 1998 年至 2012 年之间。这些综述记录了 PA 有适度的改善,但在主要研究中干预效果存在很大差异。综合综述在满足 PRISMA 标准方面,整体质量通常高于叙述性综述。
综合和叙述性综述无法有效确定有效的干预措施的特征。未来的综述应采用荟萃分析方法,以便从定量角度确定最有可能增加少数族裔成年人 PA 行为的干预措施特征。