Nicolaus Marion, Tinbergen Joost M, Ubels Richard, Both Christiaan, Dingemanse Niels J
Research Group Evolutionary Ecology of Variation, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Eberhard-Gwinner-Strasse 7, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany.
Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Science (GELIFES), University of Groningen, PO Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ecol Lett. 2016 Apr;19(4):478-86. doi: 10.1111/ele.12584. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
Heritable personality variation is subject to fluctuating selection in many animal taxa; a major unresolved question is why this is the case. A parsimonious explanation must involve a general ecological process: a likely candidate is the omnipresent spatiotemporal variation in conspecific density. We tested whether spatiotemporal variation in density within and among nest box plots of great tits (Parus major) predicted variation in selection acting on exploratory behaviour (n = 48 episodes of selection). We found viability selection favouring faster explorers under lower densities but slower explorers under higher densities. Temporal variation in local density represented the primary factor explaining personality-related variation in viability selection. Importantly, birds did not anticipate changes in selection by means of adaptive density-dependent plasticity. This study thereby provides an unprecedented example of the key importance of the interplay between fluctuating selection and lack of adaptive behavioural plasticity in maintaining animal personality variation in the wild.
在许多动物分类群中,可遗传的个性变异受到波动选择的影响;一个主要未解决的问题是为什么会这样。一个简洁的解释必须涉及一个普遍的生态过程:一个可能的候选因素是同种密度中普遍存在的时空变化。我们测试了大山雀(Parus major)巢箱地块内和地块间密度的时空变化是否能预测作用于探索行为的选择变化(n = 48次选择事件)。我们发现生存选择在低密度下有利于探索速度更快的个体,而在高密度下有利于探索速度较慢的个体。局部密度的时间变化是解释生存选择中与个性相关变异的主要因素。重要的是,鸟类不会通过适应性密度依赖可塑性来预测选择的变化。因此,本研究提供了一个前所未有的例子,说明了波动选择与缺乏适应性行为可塑性之间的相互作用在维持野生动物个性变异方面的关键重要性。