Suppr超能文献

2型内漏:非专业阅片者对动脉期和静脉期多层CT血管造影的诊断效能

Type 2 Endoleaks: The Diagnostic Performance of Non-Specialized Readers on Arterial and Venous Phase Multi-Slice CT Angiography.

作者信息

Nolz Richard, Ulrika Asenbaum, Furtner Julia, Woitek Ramona, Unterhumer Sylvia, Wibmer Andreas, Prusa Alexander, Loewe Christian, Schoder Maria

机构信息

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vienna, Austria.

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General Radiology, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0149725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149725. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To define the diagnostic precision of non-specialized readers in the detection of type 2 endoleaks (T2EL) in arterial versus venous phase acquisitions, and to evaluate an approach for radiation dose reduction.

METHODS

The pre-discharge and final follow-up multi-slice CT angiographies of 167 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Image data were separated into an arterial and a venous phase reading set. Two radiology residents assessed the reading sets for the presence of a T2EL, feeding vessels, and aneurysm sac size. Findings were compared with a standard of reference established by two experts in interventional radiology. The effective dose was calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, experts detected 131 T2ELs, and 331 feeding vessels in 334 examinations. Persistent T2ELs causing aneurysm sac growth > 5 mm were detected in 20 patients. Radiation in arterial and venous phases contributed to a mean of 58.6% and 39.0% of the total effective dose. Findings of reader 1 and 2 showed comparable sensitivities in arterial sets of 80.9 versus 85.5 (p = 0.09), and in venous sets of 73.3 versus 79.4 (p = 0.15), respectively. Reader 1 and 2 achieved a significant higher detection rate of feeding vessels with arterial compared to venous set (p = 0.04, p < 0.01). Both readers correctly identified T2ELs with growing aneurysm sac in all cases, independent of the acquisition phase.

CONCLUSION

Arterial acquisitions enable non-specialized readers an accurate detection of T2ELs, and a significant better identification of feeding vessels. Based on our results, it seems reasonable to eliminate venous phase acquisitions.

摘要

目的

确定非专业阅片者在动脉期与静脉期采集图像中检测2型内漏(T2EL)的诊断准确性,并评估一种降低辐射剂量的方法。

方法

回顾性分析167例患者出院前和最终随访的多层CT血管造影。图像数据被分为动脉期和静脉期阅片组。两名放射科住院医师评估阅片组中是否存在T2EL、供血血管和瘤囊大小。将结果与两名介入放射学专家确立的参考标准进行比较。计算有效剂量。

结果

总体而言,专家在334次检查中检测到131个T2EL和331条供血血管。在20例患者中检测到导致瘤囊增大>5mm的持续性T2EL。动脉期和静脉期的辐射分别占总有效剂量的58.6%和39.0%。阅片者1和阅片者2在动脉期阅片组中的敏感性分别为80.9%和85.5%(p = 0.09),在静脉期阅片组中的敏感性分别为73.3%和79.4%(p = 0.15),二者相当。与静脉期阅片组相比,阅片者1和阅片者2在动脉期阅片组中对供血血管的检出率显著更高(p = 0.04,p < 0.01)。两名阅片者在所有病例中均能正确识别伴有瘤囊增大的T2EL,与采集期无关。

结论

动脉期采集图像能使非专业阅片者准确检测T2EL,并能显著更好地识别供血血管。基于我们的结果,取消静脉期采集似乎是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验