Kandel B P, Bhatta D R, Shakya G, Upadhayay B P, Dumre S P, Poudyal S, Adhikari N, Acharya D
Nepal Med Coll J. 2014 Dec;16(2-4):144-7.
Temocillin is relatively more stable against most β-lactamases and requires re-evaluation to include it in common clinical practice as a therapeutic alternative. At the National Reference Laboratory of Nepal, we evaluated multidrug resistance (MDR) and extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotypes among 292 gram-negative clinical bacterial isolates of 18 different genera during 2009/2010 by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method following CLSI guidelines. ESBL screen positive isolates were tested for Temocillin efficacy by disc diffusion method following British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) guidelines and other antibiotics following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Of the 292 isolates, 75.0% isolates were MDR, among which 61.6% were primarily screened positive for ESBL production but only 38.8% were confirmed as ESBL producers. We report relatively lower Temocillin resistance of 28.9% and 15.6% among MDR and ESBL positive populations, respectively. Among ESBL positive isolates, no Proteus mirabilis, 19.7% Escherichia coli and 33.3% Klebsiella oxytoca showed resistance to Temocillin, although such resistance was higher among Acinetobacter spp. (66.7%) and K. pneumoniae 50.0%. Among ESBL negative isolates, none of the K. oxytoca and few (13.3%) Acinetobacter spp. were resistant to Temocillin, while all Citrobacter freundii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (85.7%) and K. pneumoniae (66.7%) showed Temocillin resistance. Only 14.8% and 3.0% of total MDR isolates were resistant to Imipenem and Meropenem, respectively. However, Imipenem resistance was remarkably high (86.7%) among ESBL negative Acinetobacter spp. than Meropenem (13.3%). Temocillin showed comparable efficacy against MDR and ESBL producing bacterial isolates and could be a next therapeutic option.
替莫西林对大多数β-内酰胺酶相对更稳定,需要重新评估以将其纳入常见临床实践作为一种治疗选择。在尼泊尔国家参考实验室,我们在2009/2010年期间按照CLSI指南,通过 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法对18个不同属的292株革兰氏阴性临床细菌分离株进行了多药耐药(MDR)和超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)表型评估。对ESBL筛查阳性的分离株,按照英国抗菌化疗协会(BSAC)指南通过纸片扩散法检测替莫西林的疗效,对其他抗生素则按照临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南进行检测。在这292株分离株中,75.0%的分离株为MDR,其中61.6%的分离株最初筛查ESBL产生产物呈阳性,但只有38.8%被确认为ESBL生产者。我们报告在MDR和ESBL阳性群体中,替莫西林耐药率分别相对较低,为28.9%和15.6%。在ESBL阳性分离株中,奇异变形杆菌无耐药情况,19.7%的大肠埃希菌和33.3%的产酸克雷伯菌对替莫西林耐药,尽管不动杆菌属(66.7%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(50.0%)中的耐药率更高。在ESBL阴性分离株中,产酸克雷伯菌均无耐药情况,少数不动杆菌属(13.3%)对替莫西林耐药,而所有弗氏柠檬酸杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌(85.7%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(66.7%)均对替莫西林耐药。MDR分离株中分别只有14.8%和3.0%对亚胺培南和美罗培南耐药。然而,ESBL阴性不动杆菌属中亚胺培南耐药率(86.7%)显著高于美罗培南(13.3%)。替莫西林对MDR和产ESBL细菌分离株显示出相当的疗效,可能是下一个治疗选择。