Daws Steven
J Hist Dent. 2015 Summer-Fall;63(2):54-63.
The fluoridation of municipal water as a preventive dental health measure has proven to be a contentious issue from its very outset. In 1952, Baltimore became the first major city in the United States to artificially add fluoride to its water supply. This study draws largely on print media sources as a means of discerning public sentiment, in order to evaluate the nature of Baltimore's fluoride controversy in its infancy. Initial response was influenced by prior exposure to the substance within the context of dentistry, as well as a continued trend of conservatism within the community. Logistical issues during implementation due to the necessary upscale of established practices to accommodate Baltimore's population served to further exacerbate concerns. Much of the opposition was predicated on the breadth of the measure, as evidenced by the myriad of personal concerns put forth in objection. Personal concerns developed into demands for personal autonomy, providing a philosophical foundation for the anti-fluoridation movement that persists today.
作为一项预防性牙齿健康措施,城市供水氟化从一开始就被证明是一个有争议的问题。1952年,巴尔的摩成为美国第一个人工向其供水系统中添加氟化物的主要城市。本研究主要借鉴印刷媒体来源来辨别公众情绪,以评估巴尔的摩氟化物争议初期的性质。最初的反应受到牙科领域先前对该物质接触情况的影响,以及社区内持续的保守主义趋势的影响。由于为适应巴尔的摩人口而对既定做法进行必要的扩大规模,实施过程中的后勤问题进一步加剧了人们的担忧。许多反对意见基于该措施的广泛程度,反对意见中提出的大量个人担忧就证明了这一点。个人担忧发展成为对个人自主权的要求,为至今仍存在的反氟化运动提供了哲学基础。