Kugler T E
Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2015(9):29-35.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and importance of anxiety and depression in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD), the relationship between these psychological characteristics, symptom severity and the quality of life.
We performed a cross-sectional study. 125 patients with FD according to the Rome criteria ill, as well as a control group of 30 healthy volunteers were investigated. All study participants filled out a scale to identify HADS anxiety-depressive disorder, an overall assessment of the quality of life, using a questionnaire SF-8 (standard 4-week form). FD patients were asked to rate the severity of epigastric pain (burning) or abdominal discomfort (early satiation or postprandial fullness) with LPDS scale (Leuven postprandial distress scale). All statistical analyzes were performed in the Medstat program. The results obtained with p < 0.05 and 95% CI were considered statistically significant.
Anxiety and depression were observed in 50.4% and 42.4% of FD patients, respectively, and in 13.3% and 6.66% of healthy subjects, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). The mean HADS scores for anxiety and depression in lBS patients were 7.93 ± 3.75 and 6.94 ± 3.78, respectively. Both anxiety and depression were associated with self-reported symptom severity (LPDS) (p < 0.05). As determined by correlation analysis, symptom severity was the most important factor in the prediction of anxiety and depression. Self-reported symptom severity, anxiety and depression were clearly and independently associated with the overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Biopsychosocial model of FD explained the difficulties of the pathogenesis of this disease. Anxiety and de- pression were frequently observed in FD patients and were related to the severity of their symptoms and the impairment of the patient's HRQOL. Our data suggest that assessing anxiety and depression is important when evaluating FD patients.
本研究旨在评估功能性消化不良(FD)患者焦虑和抑郁的频率及重要性、这些心理特征之间的关系、症状严重程度及生活质量。
我们进行了一项横断面研究。对125例符合罗马Ⅲ标准的FD患者以及30名健康志愿者组成的对照组进行了调查。所有研究参与者填写一份量表以识别HADS焦虑抑郁障碍,使用SF-8问卷(标准4周形式)对生活质量进行总体评估。FD患者被要求用LPDS量表(鲁汶餐后不适量表)对中上腹疼痛(烧灼感)或腹部不适(早饱或餐后饱胀)的严重程度进行评分。所有统计分析均在Medstat程序中进行。p<0.05且95%置信区间的结果被认为具有统计学意义。
FD患者中焦虑和抑郁的发生率分别为50.4%和42.4%,健康受试者中分别为13.3%和6.66%(两者p均<0.001)。FD患者焦虑和抑郁的HADS平均得分分别为7.93±3.75和6.94±3.78。焦虑和抑郁均与自我报告的症状严重程度(LPDS)相关(p<0.05)。经相关分析确定,症状严重程度是预测焦虑和抑郁的最重要因素。自我报告的症状严重程度、焦虑和抑郁与总体健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)明显且独立相关。
FD的生物心理社会模型解释了该疾病发病机制的复杂性。FD患者中经常观察到焦虑和抑郁,且与症状严重程度及患者HRQOL受损有关。我们的数据表明,评估FD患者时评估焦虑和抑郁很重要。