Sommerer Claudia, Budde Klemens, Zeier Martin, Wüthrich Rudolf P, Reinke Petra, Eisenberger Ute, Mühlfeld Anja, Arns Wolfgang, Stahl Rolf, Heller Katharina, Wolters Heiner H, Suwelack Barbara, Klehr Hans Ulrich, Hauser Ingeborg A, Stangl Manfred, Nadalin Silvio, Dürr Michael, Porstner Martina, May Christoph, Wimmer Peter, Witzke Oliver, Lehner Frank
Clin Nephrol. 2016 Apr;85(4):215-25. doi: 10.5414/CN108726.
To assess 5-year efficacy, renal, and safety outcomes following early conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus vs. a standard cyclosporine-based regimen in living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients.
The ZEUS study was a randomized, open-label, 1-year, multicenter study in which 300 de novo kidney transplant recipients continued to receive cyclosporine or converted to everolimus at 4.5 months post-transplant, with annual follow-up visits to 5 years post-transplant.
Of the 80 LDKT patients who were randomized, 75 completed the 1-year core study and 60 attended the 5-year follow-up visit. At year 5, 15/31 (48.4%) everolimus patients and 20/29 (69.0%) cyclosporine patients remained on the study drug. Mean adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at year 5 in LDKT recipients was 67.2 vs. 60.8 mL/min/1.73m2 for everolimus vs. cyclosporine (mean difference 6.4 mL/min/1.73m2; p = 0.031). For patients who remained on study drug, the mean difference was 13.2 mL/min/1.73m2 (p = 0.003), but no significant difference was seen in patients who switched from study drug (mean -2.6 mL/min/1.73m2, p = 0.701). Patient and graft survival rates were similar with everolimus and cyclosporine. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 22.0% vs. 7.5% of LDKT patients randomized to everolimus vs. cyclosporine (p = 0.116). Only 1 LDKT patient discontinued everolimus due to adverse events during years 1 - 5.
Early initiation of everolimus with calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal after LDKT improved graft function to 5 years post-transplant compared to standard CNI-based therapy. The renal benefit was concentrated in patients who remained on everolimus. An increase in mild acute rejection was not associated with long-term graft loss.
评估活体供肾移植(LDKT)受者从环孢素早期转换为依维莫司与基于环孢素的标准方案相比,5年的疗效、肾脏及安全性结局。
ZEUS研究是一项随机、开放标签、为期1年的多中心研究,300例初发肾移植受者在移植后4.5个月继续接受环孢素治疗或转换为依维莫司治疗,移植后每年随访至5年。
在80例随机分组的LDKT患者中,75例完成了1年的核心研究,60例参加了5年随访。在第5年时,依维莫司组31例中有15例(48.4%)、环孢素组29例中有20例(69.0%)仍在使用研究药物。LDKT受者在第5年时的平均校正估计肾小球滤过率(GFR),依维莫司组为67.2 mL/min/1.73m²,环孢素组为60.8 mL/min/1.73m²(平均差异6.4 mL/min/1.73m²;p = 0.031)。对于仍在使用研究药物的患者,平均差异为13.2 mL/min/1.73m²(p = 0.003),但在停用研究药物的患者中未观察到显著差异(平均-2.6 mL/min/1.73m²,p = 0.701)。依维莫司和环孢素的患者及移植物存活率相似。随机接受依维莫司与环孢素治疗的LDKT患者中,经活检证实的急性排斥反应发生率分别为22.0%和7.5%(p = 0.116)。在1至5年期间,只有1例LDKT患者因不良事件停用依维莫司。
与基于钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)的标准治疗相比,LDKT后早期启动依维莫司并停用CNI可改善移植后5年的移植物功能。肾脏获益集中在仍使用依维莫司的患者中。轻度急性排斥反应增加与长期移植物丢失无关。