• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

变异性和作用力如何在大力作用下决定协调性。

How Variability and Effort Determine Coordination at Large Forces.

作者信息

Kolossiatis Michalis, Charalambous Themistoklis, Burdet Etienne

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Department of Signals and Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0149512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149512. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149512
PMID:26934193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4774921/
Abstract

Motor control is a challenging task for the central nervous system, since it involves redundant degrees of freedom, nonlinear dynamics of actuators and limbs, as well as noise. When an action is carried out, which factors does your nervous system consider to determine the appropriate set of muscle forces between redundant degrees-of-freedom? Important factors determining motor output likely encompass effort and the resulting motor noise. However, the tasks used in many previous motor control studies could not identify these two factors uniquely, as signal-dependent noise monotonically increases as a function of the effort. To address this, a recent paper introduced a force control paradigm involving one finger in each hand that can disambiguate these two factors. It showed that the central nervous system considers both force noise and amplitude, with a larger weight on the absolute force and lower weights on both noise and normalized force. While these results are valid for the relatively low force range considered in that paper, the magnitude of the force shared between the fingers for large forces is not known. This paper investigates this question experimentally, and develops an appropriate Markov chain Monte Carlo method in order to estimate the weightings given to these factors. Our results demonstrate that the force sharing strongly depends on the force level required, so that for higher force levels the normalized force is considered as much as the absolute force, whereas the role of noise minimization becomes negligible.

摘要

运动控制对中枢神经系统来说是一项具有挑战性的任务,因为它涉及冗余自由度、致动器和肢体的非线性动力学以及噪声。当执行一个动作时,你的神经系统会考虑哪些因素来确定冗余自由度之间合适的肌肉力量组合呢?决定运动输出的重要因素可能包括努力程度和由此产生的运动噪声。然而,许多先前运动控制研究中使用的任务无法唯一地识别这两个因素,因为信号相关噪声会随着努力程度单调增加。为了解决这个问题,最近一篇论文引入了一种力控制范式,涉及每只手的一根手指,该范式可以区分这两个因素。研究表明,中枢神经系统会同时考虑力噪声和幅度,对绝对力的权重更大,对噪声和归一化力的权重较小。虽然这些结果对于该论文中考虑的相对较低力范围是有效的,但对于大力时手指间共享的力的大小尚不清楚。本文通过实验研究了这个问题,并开发了一种合适的马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法来估计赋予这些因素的权重。我们的结果表明,力的分配强烈依赖于所需的力水平,因此对于较高的力水平,归一化力与绝对力被同等考虑,而噪声最小化的作用则变得可以忽略不计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/23933553b8c5/pone.0149512.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/5518d53de7db/pone.0149512.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/8bf0e7ec866a/pone.0149512.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/bc4a26264d40/pone.0149512.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/23933553b8c5/pone.0149512.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/5518d53de7db/pone.0149512.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/8bf0e7ec866a/pone.0149512.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/bc4a26264d40/pone.0149512.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a19/4774921/23933553b8c5/pone.0149512.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
How Variability and Effort Determine Coordination at Large Forces.变异性和作用力如何在大力作用下决定协调性。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0149512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149512. eCollection 2016.
2
Control of finger force direction in the flexion-extension plane.手指在屈伸平面内的力方向控制。
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Mar;161(3):307-15. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2074-z. Epub 2004 Nov 3.
3
The effect of enslaving on perception of finger forces.束缚对手指力量感知的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jul;172(3):301-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0332-3. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
4
Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks.边缘冗余多指力产生任务中运动变异性的结构
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Nov;141(2):153-65. doi: 10.1007/s002210100861.
5
Error compensation during finger force production after one- and four-finger voluntarily fatiguing exercise.单指和四指主动疲劳运动后手指力量产生过程中的误差补偿
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Aug;181(3):461-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0942-z. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
6
Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks.静态抓握任务中与年龄相关的手指协调变化。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Jul;97(1):213-24. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00045.2004. Epub 2004 Mar 5.
7
Perception of individual finger forces during multi-finger force production tasks.在多手指力量产生任务中对单个手指力量的感知。
Neurosci Lett. 2006 Dec 6;409(3):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.057. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
8
Interaction of finger enslaving and error compensation in multiple finger force production.多手指力产生中手指从属与误差补偿的相互作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(2):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1615-2. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
9
Accurate production of time-varying patterns of the moment of force in multi-finger tasks.在多手指任务中精确生成随时间变化的力矩模式。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Oct;175(1):68-82. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0521-8. Epub 2006 May 24.
10
Dissociating variability and effort as determinants of coordination.区分变异性和努力作为协调的决定因素。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Apr;5(4):e1000345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000345. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The energetic basis for smooth human arm movements.人类手臂运动的能量基础。
Elife. 2021 Dec 20;10:e68013. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68013.

本文引用的文献

1
Muscle synergies and spinal maps are sensitive to the asymmetry induced by a unilateral stroke.肌肉协同作用和脊髓图谱对单侧中风引起的不对称敏感。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Apr 18;12:39. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0031-7.
2
Evolutionary and developmental modules.进化和发育模块。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 May 17;7:61. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00061. eCollection 2013.
3
The neural origin of muscle synergies.肌肉协同作用的神经起源。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Apr 29;7:51. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00051. eCollection 2013.
4
Dissociating variability and effort as determinants of coordination.区分变异性和努力作为协调的决定因素。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Apr;5(4):e1000345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000345. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
5
Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation.终点力波动揭示了肌肉协作的灵活模式而非协同模式。
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2455-71. doi: 10.1152/jn.90274.2008. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
6
Properties of synergies arising from a theory of optimal motor behavior.源于最优运动行为理论的协同作用特性。
Neural Comput. 2006 Oct;18(10):2320-42. doi: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.10.2320.
7
Control of fast-reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations.通过肌肉协同组合控制快速伸展运动。
J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 26;26(30):7791-810. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0830-06.2006.
8
Stochastic optimal control and estimation methods adapted to the noise characteristics of the sensorimotor system.适用于感觉运动系统噪声特性的随机最优控制与估计方法。
Neural Comput. 2005 May;17(5):1084-108. doi: 10.1162/0899766053491887.
9
Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.作为运动协调理论的最优反馈控制
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35. doi: 10.1038/nn963.