Minatel Vinicius, Takahashi Anielle C M, Perseguini Natália Maria, Milan Juliana Cristina, Castello-Simões Viviane, Gomes Ellen C, Borghi-Silva Audrey, Catai Aparecida Maria
Cardiovascular Physical Therapy Laboratory, Nucleus of Research in Physical Exercise, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Research Laboratory in Health Elderly, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Exp Physiol. 2016 May 1;101(5):599-611. doi: 10.1113/EP085203.
What is the central question of this study? This is the first study to evaluate and describe the cardiovascular responses during maximal expiratory pressure compared with the Valsalva manoeuvre, and whether those responses are similar. What is the main finding and its importance? This study showed that the duration of the manoeuvres appears to be responsible for the different physiological mechanisms involved in the cardiovascular responses to each manoeuvre and that the intensity of expiratory effort was related to the response in maximal expiratory pressure. These results are important to identify the risks to which subjects are exposed when performing these manoeuvres. The main purpose of this study was to compare the cardiovascular responses between the Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and to evaluate the effect of age on these responses. Twenty-eight healthy men were evaluated and divided into two groups, younger (n = 15, 25 ± 5 years) and middle aged (n = 13, 50 ± 5 years), and they performed the VM and MEP measurement. The VM consisted of an expiratory effort (40 mmHg) against a manometer for 15 s, and the MEP was performed according to American Thoracic Society guidelines. The cardiovascular responses were analysed at rest, isotime (3 s), peak, nadir and recovery, and the cardiovascular variations (Δ) were calculated as peak or isotime minus resting values. For the statistical analysis, we used two-way ANOVA (P < 0.05). We observed that MEP and the VM generate similar changes in cardiac output (P > 0.05), but MEP presents higher values for mean arterial pressure (MAPPeak , MAPIsotime , ΔMAP and ΔMAPIsotime ) than those observed in the VM (P < 0.05). The execution time of the manoeuvres (VM ∼15 s and MEP ∼5 s) appears to be largely responsible for the activation of different physiological mechanisms involved in the cardiovascular control for each manoeuvre, and the intensity of expiratory effort is related to the higher response of MAP and peripheral vascular resistance (PVRIsotime and ΔPVRIsotime ) during MEP (P < 0.05). Moreover, it appears that age affects only the heart rate and PVR responses (P < 0.05), which were higher in the young and middle-aged group, respectively. Based on these findings, we can conclude that MEP and the VM do not generate similar cardiovascular responses, except for cardiac output.
本研究的核心问题是什么?这是第一项评估和描述与瓦尔萨尔瓦动作相比,最大呼气压力期间心血管反应的研究,以及这些反应是否相似。主要发现及其重要性是什么?本研究表明,动作的持续时间似乎是导致对每个动作心血管反应中涉及的不同生理机制的原因,并且呼气努力的强度与最大呼气压力的反应有关。这些结果对于识别受试者在执行这些动作时所面临的风险很重要。本研究的主要目的是比较瓦尔萨尔瓦动作(VM)和最大呼气压力(MEP)之间的心血管反应,并评估年龄对这些反应的影响。对28名健康男性进行了评估,并将他们分为两组,年轻组(n = 15,25±5岁)和中年组(n = 13,50±5岁),他们进行了VM和MEP测量。VM包括对着压力计进行15秒的呼气努力(40 mmHg),MEP根据美国胸科学会指南进行。在静息、等时(3秒)、峰值、最低点和恢复时分析心血管反应,并计算心血管变化(Δ)为峰值或等时值减去静息值。对于统计分析,我们使用双向方差分析(P < 0.05)。我们观察到MEP和VM在心输出量方面产生相似的变化(P > 0.05),但MEP在平均动脉压(MAPPeak、MAPIsotime、ΔMAP和ΔMAPIsotime)方面的值高于VM中观察到的值(P < 0.05)。动作的执行时间(VM约15秒和MEP约5秒)似乎在很大程度上是导致每个动作心血管控制中涉及的不同生理机制激活的原因,并且呼气努力的强度与MEP期间MAP和外周血管阻力(PVRIsotime和ΔPVRIsotime)的更高反应有关(P < 0.05)。此外,似乎年龄仅影响心率和PVR反应(P < 0.05),分别在年轻组和中年组中更高。基于这些发现,我们可以得出结论,除了心输出量外,MEP和VM不会产生相似的心血管反应。