Wu Yingbiao, Hong Xiaojian, Wang Aihua, Wei Dan, Wang Xuhong, Liang Keji, Kou Junjie
Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Pudong New District Zhoupu Hospital, The People's Republic of China.
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, The People's Republic of China.
Heart Lung Circ. 2016 Jul;25(7):719-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
The aim is to compare effects of three different protocols of limb remote ischaemic preconditioning (LRIP) on ischaemia reperfusion injury in an acute left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion model rat.
Forty adult male Wistar rats were randomly assigned into four groups: group A, control; group B, LRIP in bilateral upper-limb (BUL) IP; group C, LRIP in bilateral lower-limb (BLL) IP; group D, LRIP in bilateral upper and lower limbs (ULL) IP. The 60min ligation and 180min reperfusion in LAD were applied to all rats. Limb remote ischaemic preconditioning was performed using 5min occlusion and 15min reperfusion (six cycles). Heart rate, blood pressure and electrogastrography (EGG) were recorded. Creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) level and infarct size were measured.
Limb remote ischaemic preconditioning did not significantly affect heart rate, systolic blood pressure and arrhythmia score. However, LRIP significantly increased DBP value and decreased CK-MB levels and infarct size in group B, C, and D. Moreover, LRIP in ULL had a significantly better effect on reducing infarct size than LRIP in BUL and BLL.
Limb remote ischaemic preconditioning at limbs could significantly reduce reperfusion injury in the heart. Moreover, LRIP in ULL indicated a better effect in reducing infarct size than LRIP in BUL and BLL.
目的是比较三种不同方案的肢体远程缺血预处理(LRIP)对急性左前降支(LAD)闭塞模型大鼠缺血再灌注损伤的影响。
将40只成年雄性Wistar大鼠随机分为四组:A组为对照组;B组为双侧上肢LRIP(BUL)预处理组;C组为双侧下肢LRIP(BLL)预处理组;D组为双侧上下肢LRIP(ULL)预处理组。对所有大鼠进行LAD结扎60分钟和再灌注180分钟。采用5分钟闭塞和15分钟再灌注(六个周期)进行肢体远程缺血预处理。记录心率、血压和胃电图(EGG)。测量肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)水平和梗死面积。
肢体远程缺血预处理对心率、收缩压和心律失常评分无显著影响。然而,LRIP显著提高了B组、C组和D组的舒张压值,并降低了CK-MB水平和梗死面积。此外,ULL的LRIP在减少梗死面积方面比BUL和BLL的LRIP效果显著更好。
肢体远程缺血预处理可显著减轻心脏的再灌注损伤。此外,ULL的LRIP在减少梗死面积方面比BUL和BLL的LRIP效果更好。