Simony Sofie B, Lund Lasse W, Erdmann Friederike, Andersen Klaus K, Winther Jeanette F, Schüz Joachim, Johansen Christoffer, Schmiegelow Kjeld, Dalton Susanne O
a Survivorship Unit, Danish Cancer Society Research Center , Copenhagen , Denmark ;
b Department of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine , University Hospital Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark ;
Acta Oncol. 2016 Jun;55(6):742-50. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1144933. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Background One fifth of all deaths among children in Europe are accounted for by cancer. If this is to be reduced there is a need for studies on not only biology and treatment approaches but also on how social factors influence cure rates. We investigated how various socioeconomic characteristics were associated with survival after childhood cancer. Material and methods In a nationwide cohort of 3797 children diagnosed with cancer [hematological cancer, central nervous system (CNS) tumors, non-CNS solid tumors] before age 20 between 1990 and 2009 we identified parents and siblings and obtained individual level parental socioeconomic variables and vital status through 2012 by linkage to population-based registries. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dying were estimated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results For all children with cancer combined, survival was slightly but not statistically significantly better the higher the education of the mother or the father, and with maternal income. Significantly better survival was observed when parents were living together compared to living alone and worse survival when the child had siblings compared to none. Young (<20) or older (≥40) maternal age showed non-significant associations, but based on small numbers. For hematological cancers, no significant associations were observed. For CNS tumors, better survival was seen with parents living together (HR 0.70, CI 0.51-0.97). For non-CNS solid tumors, survival was better with high education of the mother (HR 0.66, CI 0.44-0.99) compared to basic and worse for children with one (HR 1.45, CI 1.11-1.89) or two or more siblings (HR 1.29, CI 0.93-1.79) (p for trend 0.02) compared to none. Conclusion The impact of socioeconomic characteristics on childhood cancer survival, despite equal access to protocolled and free-of-charge treatment, warrants further and more direct studies of underlying mechanisms in order to target these as a means to improve survival rates.
背景
欧洲儿童死亡病例中有五分之一是由癌症导致的。若要降低这一比例,不仅需要开展关于生物学和治疗方法的研究,还需要研究社会因素如何影响治愈率。我们调查了各种社会经济特征与儿童癌症患者生存情况之间的关联。
材料与方法
在一个全国性队列中,我们纳入了1990年至2009年间20岁之前被诊断患有癌症(血液系统癌症、中枢神经系统肿瘤、非中枢神经系统实体瘤)的3797名儿童,并通过与基于人群的登记系统进行关联,确定了他们的父母和兄弟姐妹,获取了个体层面的父母社会经济变量以及截至2012年的生命状况。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型估计死亡的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
结果
对于所有患癌儿童而言,母亲或父亲受教育程度越高以及母亲收入越高,其生存情况虽有轻微改善但无统计学显著差异。与父母独居相比,父母共同生活时观察到生存情况显著更好;与无兄弟姐妹的儿童相比,有兄弟姐妹的儿童生存情况更差。母亲年龄较小(<20岁)或较大(≥40岁)显示出无显著关联,但样本量较小。对于血液系统癌症,未观察到显著关联。对于中枢神经系统肿瘤,父母共同生活时生存情况更好(HR 0.70,CI 0.51 - 0.97)。对于非中枢神经系统实体瘤,与母亲受基础教育相比,母亲受高等教育时生存情况更好(HR 0.66,CI 0.44 - 0.99);与无兄弟姐妹的儿童相比,有一个(HR 1.45,CI 1.11 - 1.89)或两个及以上兄弟姐妹的儿童生存情况更差(HR 1.29,CI 0.93 - 1.79)(趋势p值为0.02)。
结论
尽管在接受标准化免费治疗方面机会均等,但社会经济特征对儿童癌症生存情况的影响仍需要进一步且更直接地研究潜在机制,以便将这些因素作为提高生存率的手段加以针对性研究。