Ina H, Yasuda I
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989 Nov;37(11):2318-27.
The myocardial protection afforded by GIK solution, widely used as cardioplegic solution in this country, was compared with that provided by St. Thomas solution or oxygenated St. Thomas solution. Eighteen isolated heart-lung preparations of dogs were made and their hearts were subjected to 3 hours cold (4 degrees C) cardioplegic arrest. GIK group hearts (n = 6) received 20 ml/kg of GIK solution at the time of aortic cross-clamp perfused through the aortic root and were subsequently given 10 ml/kg of GIK solution every 30 minutes. St. Thomas group hearts (n = 6) and oxygenated St. Thomas group hearts (n = 6) were treated identically except that cardioplegic solution were St. Thomas solution or fully oxygenated one. Four hearts of GIK group showed ventricular fibrillation immediately after reperfusion that required DC countershock. Temporary A-V block was recognized in two hearts. In the other two groups, however, neither ventricular fibrillation nor A-V block was found. Heart rate, coronary flow, aortic flow and LVSW were measured before arrest and after 60 minutes of reperfusion (mean aortic pressure 70 mmHg, left atrial pressure 4 mmHg). Post reperfusion % recovery rates (post-reperfusion/before arrest) of heart rate, coronary flow, aortic flow and LVSW (mean value +/- standard deviation) were 93.4 +/- 10.32%, 104.6 +/- 24.91%, 18.8 +/- 8.54%, 32.6 +/- 6.12% respectively for GIK group, 81.4 +/- 6.50%, 125.9 +/- 15.23%, 35.4 +/- 9.91%, 56.3 +/- 12.90% for St. Thomas group and 83.1 +/- 8.40%, 121.6 +/- 16.92%, 47.0 +/- 7.89%, 69.1 +/- 9.71% for oxygenated St. Thomas group. St. Thomas and oxygenated St. Thomas groups revealed significantly (p less than 0.05, p less than 0.01 respectively) more excellent functional preservation than GIK group. Intramyocardial pH was also measured by use of glass needle pH electrode punctured into the anterior interventricular septum. Preischemic intramyocardial pH (at 37 degrees C) was 7.49 +/- 0.106 in GIK group, 7.48 +/- 0.113 in St. Thomas group and 7.43 +/- 0.114 in oxygenated St. Thomas group. During 3 hours of cardioplegic arrest, intramyocardial pH (at 4 degrees C) decreased to 6.84 +/- 0.101 in GIK group, 7.03 +/- 0.088 in St. Thomas group and 7.23 +/- 0.239 in oxygenated St. Thomas group, which was significantly higher than GIK group (p less than 0.01). Therefore oxygenated St. Thomas solution was found to maintain more favorable energy supply to ischemic myocardium. These results clearly evidenced that St. Thomas and oxygenated St. Thomas solutions would provide more effective myocardial protection during ischemic arrest than GIK solution.
在我国被广泛用作心脏停搏液的极化液(GIK溶液)所提供的心肌保护作用,与圣托马斯液或氧合圣托马斯液所提供的心肌保护作用进行了比较。制备了18例犬离体心肺标本,使其心脏接受3小时的冷(4℃)心脏停搏。极化液组心脏(n = 6)在主动脉交叉钳夹时经主动脉根部灌注20 ml/kg的极化液,随后每30分钟给予10 ml/kg的极化液。圣托马斯液组心脏(n = 6)和氧合圣托马斯液组心脏(n = 6)的处理方式相同,只是心脏停搏液分别为圣托马斯液或完全氧合的圣托马斯液。极化液组有4例心脏在再灌注后立即出现心室颤动,需要直流电除颤。2例心脏出现暂时性房室传导阻滞。然而,在其他两组中,未发现心室颤动和房室传导阻滞。在心脏停搏前及再灌注60分钟后(平均主动脉压70 mmHg,左心房压4 mmHg)测量心率、冠状动脉血流量、主动脉血流量和左心室搏功。极化液组心率、冠状动脉血流量、主动脉血流量和左心室搏功的再灌注后恢复率(再灌注后/停搏前)(平均值±标准差)分别为93.4±10.32%、104.6±24.91%、18.8±8.54%、32.6±6.12%;圣托马斯液组分别为81.4±6.50%、125.9±15.23%、35.4±9.91%、56.3±12.90%;氧合圣托马斯液组分别为83.1±8.40%、121.6±16.92%、47.0±7.89%、69.1±9.71%。圣托马斯液组和氧合圣托马斯液组在功能保存方面明显(分别为p<0.05,p<0.01)比极化液组更优。还使用刺入室间隔前部的玻璃针pH电极测量心肌内pH值。极化液组缺血前心肌内pH值(37℃时)为7.49±0.106,圣托马斯液组为7.48±0.113,氧合圣托马斯液组为7.43±0.114。在3小时心脏停搏期间,极化液组心肌内pH值(4℃时)降至6.84±0.101,圣托马斯液组为7.03±0.088,氧合圣托马斯液组为7.23±0.239,明显高于极化液组(p<0.0