• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试还是休息?儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤后急诊科的计算机认知测试不会延迟症状恢复。

Test or Rest? Computerized Cognitive Testing in the Emergency Department after Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Does Not Delay Symptom Recovery.

作者信息

Brooks Brian L, Low Trevor A, Daya Hussain, Khan Samna, Mikrogianakis Angelo, Barlow Karen M

机构信息

1 Department of Neurosciences (Brain Injury and Vi Riddell Rehabilitation Programs), Alberta Children's Hospital , Calgary, Alberta, Canada .

2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada .

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2016 Dec 1;33(23):2091-2096. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4301. Epub 2016 May 9.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2015.4301
PMID:26936646
Abstract

Rest is commonly prescribed following a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). There is concern that cognitive exertion by an acutely or sub-acutely injured brain may negatively alter outcome. The objective of this study was to determine if computerized cognitive testing in the emergency department alters symptom outcome from mTBI. Participants included 77 youth with mTBI who underwent computerized cognitive testing (mean age, 13.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.0-14.2) and were matched to 77 youth with mTBI who did not participate in cognitive testing (mean age, 13.5; 95% CI = 12.9-14.0). Participants who underwent cognitive testing did not differ from those who did not undergo acute cognitive testing on mean symptom ratings or the proportion who were not recovered at 7-10 days, 1 month, 2 months, or 3 months. There also was no difference in symptom outcome for those who underwent a shortened (four subtests, mean time = 16 min) or full-length (seven subtests, mean time = 28 min) version of the computerized test. Brief cognitive exertion using a computerized cognitive assessment after mTBI in youth does not result in worse symptoms at these follow-up periods, does not prolong symptom recovery, should not be considered contraindicated to recovery, and could be considered as another tool to aid in the management of these injuries. Further research with different samples is warranted.

摘要

轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后通常会建议休息。有人担心急性或亚急性损伤的大脑进行认知活动可能会对预后产生负面影响。本研究的目的是确定急诊科的计算机化认知测试是否会改变mTBI的症状预后。参与者包括77名接受计算机化认知测试的mTBI青少年(平均年龄13.6岁;95%置信区间[CI]=13.0-14.2),并与77名未参与认知测试的mTBI青少年进行匹配(平均年龄13.5岁;95%CI=12.9-14.0)。接受认知测试的参与者与未接受急性认知测试的参与者在平均症状评分或7-10天、1个月、2个月或3个月时未恢复的比例方面没有差异。对于接受缩短版(四个子测试,平均时间=16分钟)或完整版(七个子测试,平均时间=28分钟)计算机化测试的参与者,症状预后也没有差异。青少年mTBI后使用计算机化认知评估进行简短的认知活动在这些随访期内不会导致更严重的症状,不会延长症状恢复时间,不应被视为恢复的禁忌,并且可以被视为辅助管理这些损伤的另一种工具。有必要对不同样本进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Test or Rest? Computerized Cognitive Testing in the Emergency Department after Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Does Not Delay Symptom Recovery.测试还是休息?儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤后急诊科的计算机认知测试不会延迟症状恢复。
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Dec 1;33(23):2091-2096. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4301. Epub 2016 May 9.
2
Cognition in the Emergency Department as a Predictor of Recovery after Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.急诊科认知功能作为小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤后恢复情况的预测指标
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Apr;22(4):379-87. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715001368. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
3
Predicting Concussion Recovery in Children and Adolescents in the Emergency Department.预测急诊科儿童和青少年脑震荡的恢复情况。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Sep 19;18(11):78. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0881-z.
4
Can Computerized Neuropsychological Testing in the Emergency Department Predict Recovery for Young Athletes With Concussions?急诊科的计算机化神经心理测试能否预测年轻脑震荡运动员的恢复情况?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Oct;31(10):688-93. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000438.
5
Three versus seven days to return-to-work after mild traumatic brain injury: a randomized parallel-group trial with neuropsychological assessment.轻度创伤性脑损伤后3天与7天恢复工作的比较:一项伴有神经心理学评估的随机平行组试验
Int J Neurosci. 2017 Oct;127(10):900-908. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2017.1278589. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
6
Sustained outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: results of a five-emergency department longitudinal study.轻度创伤性脑损伤后的持续结果:一项针对五个急诊科的纵向研究结果
Brain Inj. 2014;28(10):1248-56. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.916420. Epub 2014 May 19.
7
Neurocognition in the emergency department after a mild traumatic brain injury in youth.青少年轻度创伤性脑损伤后急诊科的神经认知情况
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Oct 15;31(20):1744-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3356. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
8
Incorporating a Computerized Cognitive Battery Into the Emergency Department Care of Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries-Is It Feasible?将计算机化认知测试组合纳入小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤的急诊科护理——是否可行?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Jul;34(7):501-506. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000959.
9
Recovery from Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Previously Healthy Adults.既往健康成年人轻度创伤性脑损伤的恢复情况。
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Apr 15;33(8):766-76. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4070. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Efficacy of immediate and delayed cognitive and physical rest for treatment of sports-related concussion.即刻和延迟认知与身体休息治疗运动相关性脑震荡的疗效。
J Pediatr. 2012 Nov;161(5):922-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.04.012. Epub 2012 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Proposing a "Brain Health Checkup (BHC)" as a Global Potential "Standard of Care" to Overcome Reward Dysregulation in Primary Care Medicine: Coupling Genetic Risk Testing and Induction of "Dopamine Homeostasis".提出“大脑健康检查(BHC)”作为克服初级保健医学中奖励调节障碍的全球潜在“标准护理”:结合遗传风险测试和诱导“多巴胺稳态”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 30;19(9):5480. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095480.
2
Predicting Concussion Recovery in Children and Adolescents in the Emergency Department.预测急诊科儿童和青少年脑震荡的恢复情况。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Sep 19;18(11):78. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0881-z.
3
Advancing Concussion Assessment in Pediatrics (A-CAP): a prospective, concurrent cohort, longitudinal study of mild traumatic brain injury in children: protocol study.
儿科脑震荡评估进展(A-CAP):一项关于儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤的前瞻性、同期队列纵向研究:方案研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e017012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017012.