Sun Kaiqiong, Udupa Jayaram K, Odhner Dewey, Tong Yubing, Zhao Liming, Torigian Drew A
School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.
Medical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Med Phys. 2016 Mar;43(3):1487-500. doi: 10.1118/1.4942486.
In an attempt to overcome several hurdles that exist in organ segmentation approaches, the authors previously described a general automatic anatomy recognition (AAR) methodology for segmenting all major organs in multiple body regions body-wide [J. K. Udupa et al., "Body-wide hierarchical fuzzy modeling, recognition, and delineation of anatomy in medical images," Med. Image Anal. 18(5), 752-771 (2014)]. That approach utilized fuzzy modeling strategies, a hierarchical organization of organs, and divided the segmentation task into a recognition step to localize organs which was then followed by a delineation step to demarcate the boundary of organs. It achieved speed and accuracy without employing image/object registration which is commonly utilized in many reported methods, particularly atlas-based. In this paper, our aim is to study how registration may influence performance of the AAR approach. By tightly coupling the recognition and delineation steps, by performing registration in the hierarchical order of the organs, and through several object-specific refinements, the authors demonstrate that improved accuracy for recognition and delineation can be achieved by judicial use of image/object registration.
The presented approach consists of three processes: model building, hierarchical recognition, and delineation. Labeled binary images for each organ are registered and aligned into a 3D fuzzy set representing the fuzzy shape model for the organ. The hierarchical relation and mean location relation between different organs are captured in the model. The gray intensity distributions of the corresponding regions of the organ in the original image are also recorded in the model. Following the hierarchical structure and location relation, the fuzzy shape model of different organs is registered to the given target image to achieve object recognition. A fuzzy connectedness delineation method is then employed to obtain the final segmentation result of organs with seed points provided by recognition. The authors assess the performance of this method for both nonsparse (compact blob-like) and sparse (thin tubular) objects in the thorax.
The results of eight thoracic organs on 30 real images are presented. Overall, the delineation accuracy in terms of mean false positive and false negative volume fractions is 0.34% and 4.02%, respectively, for nonsparse objects, and 0.16% and 12.6%, respectively, for sparse objects. The two object groups achieve mean boundary distance relative to ground truth of 1.31 and 2.28 mm, respectively.
The hierarchical structure and location relation integrated into the model provide the initial pose for registration and make the recognition process efficient and robust. The 3D fuzzy model combined with hierarchical affine registration ensures that accurate recognition can be obtained for both nonsparse and sparse organs. Tailoring the registration process for each organ by specialized similarity criteria and updating the organ intensity properties based on refined recognition improve the overall segmentation process.
为了克服器官分割方法中存在的若干障碍,作者之前描述了一种通用的自动解剖识别(AAR)方法,用于在全身多个身体区域分割所有主要器官[J.K.乌杜帕等人,“医学图像中全身层次模糊建模、解剖识别与描绘”,《医学图像分析》18(5),752 - 771(2014)]。该方法利用模糊建模策略、器官的层次结构,并将分割任务分为一个识别步骤来定位器官,随后是一个描绘步骤来划定器官边界。它在不采用许多已报道方法(特别是基于图谱的方法)中常用的图像/对象配准的情况下实现了速度和准确性。在本文中,我们的目的是研究配准如何影响AAR方法的性能。通过紧密耦合识别和描绘步骤,按器官的层次顺序进行配准,并通过几个特定对象的细化,作者证明了通过合理使用图像/对象配准可以提高识别和描绘的准确性。
所提出的方法包括三个过程:模型构建、层次识别和描绘。每个器官的标记二值图像被配准并对齐到一个表示该器官模糊形状模型的3D模糊集。模型中捕获了不同器官之间的层次关系和平均位置关系。原始图像中器官相应区域的灰度强度分布也记录在模型中。按照层次结构和位置关系,将不同器官的模糊形状模型配准到给定的目标图像以实现对象识别。然后采用模糊连通性描绘方法,利用识别提供的种子点获得器官的最终分割结果。作者评估了该方法对胸部非稀疏(紧凑斑点状)和稀疏(细管状)对象的性能。
给出了30幅真实图像上八个胸部器官的结果。总体而言,对于非稀疏对象,以平均假阳性和假阴性体积分数衡量的描绘准确率分别为0.34%和4.02%,对于稀疏对象分别为0.16%和12.6%。这两组对象相对于真实情况的平均边界距离分别为1.31和2.28毫米。
模型中集成的层次结构和位置关系为配准提供了初始姿态,使识别过程高效且稳健。3D模糊模型与层次仿射配准相结合,确保了对非稀疏和稀疏器官都能获得准确的识别。通过专门的相似性标准为每个器官定制配准过程,并基于细化的识别更新器官强度属性,可改善整体分割过程。