Sbrana Francesco, Ripoli Andrea, Formichi Bruno
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy; National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2015 Jul 29;15(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2015.07.003. eCollection 2015 Mar-Apr.
Anesthetic management of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation has specific requirements. The feasibility of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) added to deep sedation procedure was evaluated. Seventy-two patients who underwent ablation procedure were retrospectively revised, performed with (57%) or without (43%) application of NIV (Respironic(®) latex-free total face mask connected to Garbin ventilator-Linde Inc.) during deep sedation (Midazolam 0.01-0.02 mg/kg, fentanyl 2.5-5 μg/kg and propofol: bolus dose 1-1.5 mg/kg, maintenance 2-4 mg/kg/h). In the two groups (NIV vs deep sedation), differences were detected in intraprocedural (pH 7.37 ± 0.05 vs 7.32 ± 0.05, p = 0.001; PaO2 117.10 ± 27.25 vs 148.17 ± 45.29, p = 0.004; PaCO2 43.37 ± 6.91 vs 49.33 ± 7.34, p = 0.002) and in percentage variation with respect to basal values (pH -0.52 ± 0.83 vs -1.44 ± 0.87, p = 0.002; PaCO2 7.21 ± 15.55 vs 34.91 ± 25.76, p = 0.001) of arterial blood gas parameters. Two episodes of respiratory complications, treated with application of NIV, were reported in deep sedation procedure. Endotracheal intubation was not necessary in any case. Adverse events related to electrophysiological procedures and recurrence of atrial fibrillation were recorded, respectively, in 36% and 29% of cases. NIV proved to be feasible in this context and maintained better respiratory homeostasis and better arterial blood gas balance when added to deep sedation.
接受房颤肺静脉隔离术患者的麻醉管理有特定要求。我们评估了在深度镇静过程中增加无创通气(NIV)的可行性。回顾性分析了72例行消融术的患者,其中57%在深度镇静(咪达唑仑0.01 - 0.02mg/kg、芬太尼2.5 - 5μg/kg和丙泊酚:推注剂量1 - 1.5mg/kg,维持剂量2 - 4mg/kg/h)时应用了NIV(连接到Garbin呼吸机-Linde公司的Respironic®无乳胶全脸面罩),43%未应用。在两组(NIV组与深度镇静组)中,术中动脉血气参数(pH 7.37±0.05 vs 7.32±0.05,p = 0.001;PaO2 117.10±27.25 vs 148.17±45.29,p = 0.004;PaCO2 43.37±6.91 vs 49.33±7.34,p = 0.002)以及相对于基础值的百分比变化(pH -0.52±0.83 vs -1.44±0.87,p = 0.002;PaCO2 7.21±15.55 vs 34.91±25.76,p = 0.001)存在差异。在深度镇静过程中报告了2例呼吸并发症,通过应用NIV进行了治疗。在任何情况下均无需气管插管。分别有36%和29%的病例记录了与电生理手术相关的不良事件和房颤复发情况。在这种情况下,NIV被证明是可行的,并且在深度镇静中加入NIV可维持更好的呼吸稳态和更好的动脉血气平衡。