Devlin John W, Al-Qadheeb Nada S, Chi Amy, Roberts Russel J, Qawi Imrana, Garpestad Erik, Hill Nicholas S
School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine.
School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University.
Chest. 2014 Jun;145(6):1204-1212. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1448.
Successful application of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) requires patient cooperation and comfort. The efficacy and safety of early IV dexmedetomidine when added to protocolized, as-needed IV midazolam and fentanyl remain unclear.
Adults with ARF and within 8 h of starting NIV were randomized to receive IV dexmedetomidine (0.2 μg/kg/h titrated every 30 min to 0.7 μg/kg/h to maintain a Sedation-Agitation Scale [SAS] score of 3 to 4) or placebo in a double-blind fashion up to 72 h, until NIV was stopped for ≥ 2 h, or until intubation. Patients with agitation (SAS ≥ 5) or pain (visual analog scale ≥ 5 of 10 cm) 15 min after each dexmedetomidine and placebo increase could receive IV midazolam 0.5 to 1.0 mg or IV fentanyl 25 to 50 μg, respectively, at a minimum interval of every 3 h.
The dexmedetomidine (n = 16) and placebo (n = 17) groups were similar at baseline. Use of early dexmedetomidine did not improve NIV tolerance (score, 1 of 4; OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.44-4.70; P = .54) nor, vs. placebo, led to a greater median (interquartile range) percent time either tolerating NIV (99% [61%-100%] vs. 67% [40%-100%], P = .56) or remaining at the desired sedation level (SAS score = 3 or 4, 100% [86%-100%] vs. 100% [100%-100%], P = .28], or fewer intubations (P = .79). Although use of dexmedetomidine was associated with a greater duration of NIV vs placebo (37 [16-72] vs. 12 [4-22] h, P = .03), the total ventilation duration (NIV + invasive) was similar (3.3 [2-4] days vs. 3.8 [2-5] days, P = .52). More patients receiving dexmedetomidine had one or more episodes of deep sedation vs placebo (SAS ≤ 2, 25% vs. 0%, P = .04). Use of midazolam (P = .40) and episodes of either severe bradycardia (heart rate ≤ 50 beats/min, P = .18) or hypotension (systolic BP ≤ 90 mm Hg, P = .64) were similar.
Initiating dexmedetomidine soon after NIV initiation in patients with ARF neither improves NIV tolerance nor helps to maintain sedation at a desired goal. Randomized, multicenter trials targeting patients with initial intolerance are needed to further elucidate the role for dexmedetomidine in this population.
无创通气(NIV)成功应用于急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)需要患者的配合与舒适感。在按方案按需静脉注射咪达唑仑和芬太尼的基础上,早期静脉注射右美托咪定的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。
成年ARF患者在开始NIV的8小时内被随机双盲分为两组,分别接受静脉注射右美托咪定(0.2μg/kg/h,每30分钟滴定至0.7μg/kg/h,以维持镇静-躁动评分[SAS]为3至4分)或安慰剂,持续72小时,直至NIV停止≥2小时或直至插管。每次增加右美托咪定和安慰剂15分钟后出现躁动(SAS≥5)或疼痛(视觉模拟评分≥10cm中的5分)的患者,可分别接受静脉注射咪达唑仑0.5至1.0mg或静脉注射芬太尼25至50μg,最小间隔时间为每3小时一次。
右美托咪定组(n = 16)和安慰剂组(n = 17)在基线时相似。早期使用右美托咪定并未改善NIV耐受性(评分,4分中的1分;OR,1.44;95%CI,0.44 - 4.70;P = 0.54),与安慰剂相比,也未导致耐受NIV的中位(四分位间距)时间百分比更高(99%[61% - 100%]对67%[40% - 100%],P = 0.56)或维持在所需镇静水平(SAS评分 = 3或4)的时间百分比更高(100%[86% - 100%]对100%[100% - 100%]),P = 0.28),插管次数也未减少(P = 0.79)。虽然与安慰剂相比,使用右美托咪定与NIV持续时间更长有关(37[16 - 72]对12[4 - 22]小时,P = 0.03),但总通气时间(NIV + 有创通气)相似(3.3[2 - 4]天对3.8[2 - 5]天,P = 0.52)。与安慰剂相比,接受右美托咪定的患者有更多人出现一次或多次深度镇静(SAS≤2,25%对0%,P = 0.04)。咪达唑仑的使用(P = 0.40)以及严重心动过缓(心率≤50次/分钟,P = 0.18)或低血压(收缩压≤90mmHg,P = 0.64)的发作情况相似。
在ARF患者开始NIV后不久开始使用右美托咪定既不能提高NIV耐受性,也无助于维持所需的镇静目标。需要针对初始不耐受患者进行随机、多中心试验,以进一步阐明右美托咪定在该人群中的作用。