Suppr超能文献

对有起搏器和复发性晕厥的患者进行倾斜试验。

Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope.

作者信息

Haarmark Christian, Kanters Jørgen K, Mehlsen Jesper

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark; Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.

Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2015 Oct 19;15(4):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007. eCollection 2015 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

The diagnosis of recurrent syncope in patients with pacemakers (PM) is quite challenging and the etiology of syncope is often multifactorial. To portray the mechanism of syncope in PM patients, we report the results of head-up tilt table testing (HUT) in a series of patients with PM, originally implanted for reasons other than neurally mediated syncope, referred due to syncope or pre-syncope (aborted syncope, vertigo, suspected orthostatic hypotension). Forty-one patients with PM undergoing a HUT in our syncope unit between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st 2011 were included. A standard HUT protocol with nitroglycerine provocation was used and the test results were classified according to current guidelines. Baseline data were retrieved from the medical records. Overall, 54% of patients had a positive response to HUT. Vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response were the most prevalent responses accounting for 72% of patients with a positive test. There were no differences between groups with positive or negative test result regarding age, gender, resting blood pressure and heart rate, daily fluid intake, pacing mode, pacing indication or pacing rhythm at rest. HUT in patients with pacemakers has a high diagnostic yield. Although, the majority of patients had a vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response, cardioinhibitory response leading to syncope was also seen.

摘要

对于起搏器(PM)植入患者,复发性晕厥的诊断颇具挑战性,晕厥病因往往是多因素的。为描述PM患者晕厥的机制,我们报告了一系列PM患者的直立倾斜试验(HUT)结果,这些患者最初因非神经介导性晕厥以外的原因植入起搏器,因晕厥或晕厥前期(先兆晕厥、眩晕、疑似体位性低血压)前来就诊。纳入了2007年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间在我们晕厥单元接受HUT的41例PM患者。采用了含硝酸甘油激发的标准HUT方案,并根据现行指南对测试结果进行分类。从病历中获取基线数据。总体而言,54%的患者对HUT有阳性反应。血管减压或体位性低血压反应是最常见的反应,占阳性测试患者的72%。在测试结果为阳性或阴性的组之间,在年龄、性别、静息血压和心率、每日液体摄入量、起搏模式、起搏指征或静息时的起搏节律方面没有差异。起搏器患者的HUT具有较高的诊断率。尽管大多数患者有血管减压或体位性低血压反应,但也可见导致晕厥的心脏抑制反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f5/4750138/8d5025f054b2/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验