Hock D, Materne R, Ouhadi R, Mancini I, Aouachria S A, Nchimi A
Department of Medical Imaging, Centre Hospitalier Chrétien (CHC), Rue de Hesbaye, 75, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Imaging, CHU de Liège, Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman, Bâtiment B 35, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2015 Jan 8;2:32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2014.12.002. eCollection 2015.
We evaluated the rate of significant colonic and extra-colonic abnormalities at computed tomography colonography (CTC), according to symptoms and age.
We retrospectively evaluated 7361 consecutive average-risk subjects (3073 males, average age: 60.3 ± 13.9; range 18-96 years) for colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent CTC. They were divided into three groups according to clinical symptoms: 1343 asymptomatic individuals (group A), 899 patients with at least one "alarm" symptom for CRC, including rectal bleeding and unexplained weight loss (group C), and 5119 subjects with other gastrointestinal symptoms (group B). Diagnostic and test-positive rates of CTC were established using optical colonoscopy (OC) and/or surgery as reference standard. In addition, clinically significant extra-colonic findings were noted.
903 out of 7361 (12%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.13) subjects had at least one clinically significant colonic finding at CTC. CTC true positive fraction and false positive fraction were respectively 637/642 (99.2%, 95%CI 0.98-0.99) and 55/692 (7.95%, 95%CI 0.05-0.09). The pooled test-positive rate in group C (138/689, 20.0%, 95%CI 0.17-0.23) was significantly higher than in both groups A (79/1343, 5.9%, 95%CI 0.04-0.07) and B (420/5329, 7.5%, 95%CI 0.07-0.08) (p < 0.001). Aging and male gender were associated to a higher test positive rate. The rate of clinically significant extra-colonic findings was significantly higher in group C (44/689, 6.4%, 95%CI 0.04-0.08) versus groups A (26/1343, 1.9%, 95%CI 0.01-0.02) and B (64/5329, 1.2%, 95%CI 0.01-0.02) (p < 0.001).
Both test-positive and significant extra-colonic finding rates at CTC are significantly increased in the presence of "alarm" gastrointestinal symptoms especially in older patients.
我们根据症状和年龄评估了计算机断层结肠成像(CTC)时结肠及结肠外显著异常的发生率。
我们回顾性评估了7361例接受CTC检查的平均风险结直肠癌(CRC)患者(3073例男性,平均年龄:60.3±13.9岁;范围18 - 96岁)。根据临床症状将他们分为三组:1343例无症状个体(A组),899例有至少一种CRC“警示”症状的患者,包括直肠出血和不明原因体重减轻(C组),以及5119例有其他胃肠道症状的受试者(B组)。以光学结肠镜检查(OC)和/或手术作为参考标准确定CTC的诊断率和检查阳性率。此外,记录临床上显著的结肠外发现。
7361例受试者中有903例(12%,95%置信区间(CI)0.11 - 0.13)在CTC时有至少一项临床上显著的结肠发现。CTC的真阳性率和假阳性率分别为637/642(99.2%,95%CI 0.98 - 0.99)和55/692(7.95%,95%CI 0.05 - 0.09)。C组的合并检查阳性率(138/689,20.0%,95%CI 0.17 - 0.23)显著高于A组(79/1343,5.9%,95%CI 0.04 - 0.07)和B组(420/5329,7.5%,95%CI 0.07 - 0.08)(p < 0.001)。年龄增长和男性与较高的检查阳性率相关。C组临床上显著的结肠外发现率(44/689,6.4%,95%CI 0.04 - 0.08)显著高于A组(26/1343,1.9%,95%CI 0.01 - 0.02)和B组(64/5329,1.2%,95%CI 0.01 - 0.02)(p < 0.001)。
在存在胃肠道“警示”症状时,尤其是老年患者,CTC的检查阳性率和显著结肠外发现率均显著增加。