• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

项目资源投入的差异是否会导致美国国家物理治疗考试三年通过率的不同?

Do Differences in Programmatic Resource Investments Result in Different 3-Year Pass Rates on the U.S. National Physical Therapy Examination?

作者信息

Covington Kyle, McCallum Christine, Engelhard Chalee, Landry Michel D, Cook Chad

机构信息

Duke DPT Division, Dep. of Orthopedics, Duke University, DUMC 104002, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Tel 919-684-9598.

出版信息

J Allied Health. 2016 Spring;45(1):27-32.

PMID:26937879
Abstract

PURPOSE

The rising cost of health professions education is well documented and a growing concern among educators; however, little is known about the implications of resource investment on student success. The objective of this study was to determine whether programs with higher National Physical Therapist Exam (NPTE) pass rates invested significantly more on programmatic resources.

METHODS

This observational study used data from the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education's (CAPTE) Annual Accreditation Report including all accredited physical therapist programs from the United States who graduated physical therapist students in 2011. Resource expenditures were recorded as both raw and as an index variable (resources per student). Descriptive statistics and comparisons (using chi-square and t-tests) among programs with <100% and 100% pass rates were analyzed from 2009-2011. An ANCOVA was used to determine differences in raw resource expenditures and resource expenditures per student.

RESULTS

There were no differences in raw resource expenditures between programs with <100% and 100% pass rates. Programs with 100% pass rates were provided more resource expenditures per student for personnel, overall budget, and core faculty.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest programs with 100% pass rates invested significantly more per student for selected resources.

摘要

目的

卫生专业教育成本不断上升,这一点有充分记录,且日益引起教育工作者的关注;然而,对于资源投入对学生学业成功的影响却知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定国家物理治疗师考试(NPTE)通过率较高的项目在项目资源上的投入是否显著更多。

方法

这项观察性研究使用了物理治疗教育认证委员会(CAPTE)年度认证报告中的数据,包括2011年毕业于物理治疗专业学生的美国所有获得认证的物理治疗项目。资源支出记录为原始数据和指数变量(人均资源)。对2009 - 2011年通过率低于100%和100%的项目进行描述性统计和比较(使用卡方检验和t检验)。使用协方差分析来确定原始资源支出和人均资源支出的差异。

结果

通过率低于100%和100%的项目在原始资源支出方面没有差异。通过率为100%的项目在人员、总体预算和核心教师方面的人均资源支出更多。

结论

本研究结果表明,通过率为100%的项目在选定资源上的人均投入显著更多。

相似文献

1
Do Differences in Programmatic Resource Investments Result in Different 3-Year Pass Rates on the U.S. National Physical Therapy Examination?项目资源投入的差异是否会导致美国国家物理治疗考试三年通过率的不同?
J Allied Health. 2016 Spring;45(1):27-32.
2
Characteristics of Professional Physical Therapist Faculty and Doctor of Physical Therapy Programs, 2008-2017: Influences on Graduation Rates and First-Time National Physical Therapy Examination Pass Rates.2008-2017 年专业物理治疗师师资和物理治疗博士课程的特点:对毕业率和首次全国物理治疗考试通过率的影响。
Phys Ther. 2020 Oct 30;100(11):1930-1947. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa148.
3
Modifiable variables in physical therapy education programs associated with first-time and three-year National Physical Therapy Examination pass rates in the United States.与美国首次及三年期国家物理治疗考试通过率相关的物理治疗教育项目中的可改变变量。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015 Sep 23;12:44. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.44. eCollection 2015.
4
Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs.学术研究产出与物理治疗学术项目较高的三年执照通过率无关。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Sep 11;15:148. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0431-1.
5
Impact of Faculty and Programmatic Resources on the Proportion of Academic Doctoral Degrees in Professional Physical Therapist Education Programs.师资和项目资源对专业物理治疗教育项目中学术博士学位比例的影响。
Phys Ther. 2021 Apr 4;101(4). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab030.
6
Academic difficulty and program-level variables predict performance on the National Physical Therapy Examination for licensure: a population-based cohort study.学业困难和项目水平变量可预测全国物理治疗执照考试的成绩:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Phys Ther. 2009 Nov;89(11):1182-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080400. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
7
Selectivity of physiotherapist programs in the United States does not differ by institutional funding source or research activity level.美国物理治疗师项目的选择性不会因机构资金来源或研究活动水平而有所不同。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Apr 15;13:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.17. eCollection 2016.
8
A factors influencing applicant selection of entry-level physical therapist education programs in the United States.影响美国入门级物理治疗教育项目申请人选择的因素。
J Allied Health. 2005 Spring;34(1):11-6.
9
Characteristics of US-based physical therapist education programs cited for core faculty deficiencies in 2019-2020.2019-2020 年被指核心教师人员不足的美国物理治疗教育项目的特点。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Sep 2;39(9):2025-2036. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2062691. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
10
Physical therapist student interest in full-time faculty positions.物理治疗专业学生对全职教师职位的兴趣。
J Allied Health. 2002 Summer;31(2):70-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of research productivity among physical therapy programs in the United States: an observational study.美国物理治疗项目科研产出的预测因素:一项观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 11;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02133-1.