Suppr超能文献

医师助理、物理治疗师、职业治疗师、临床心理学和生物医学科学专业学生的职业素养。

Professionalism in Physician Assistant, Physical Therapist, Occupational Therapist, Clinical Psychology, and Biomedical Sciences Students.

作者信息

Noronha Sandhya, Anderson Deborah, Lee Michelle M, Krumdick Nathaniel D, Irwin Kent E, Burton-Hess Judith, Ciancio Mae, Wallingford Minetta, Workman Gloria M

机构信息

Physician Assistant Program, Midwestern University, 555 31st Street, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA. Tel 630-515-6034.

出版信息

J Allied Health. 2016 Spring;45(1):71-8.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Interprofessional collaboration for healthcare requires a better understanding of the commonalities and differences in student perceptions of professionalism.

METHODS

217 students in five programs (PA 71, PT 46, OT 29, CP 12, and BMS 59) completed a 22-item survey (response rate 79.5%). A Likert scale grading from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (always) was used to assess professional attitudes and behaviors.

RESULTS

A mixed-model MANOVA, supplemented with post-hoc analyses, showed significant group by time interactions for 5 items. Sensitivity to differences and diversity of other people increased for BMS students, but decreased for PT students. Timeliness increased for BMS students, but did not change for PA students. Seeking out new learning experiences increased for BMS students, but did not change for PA or PT students. Taking a group leadership role increased for BMS students, decreased for PT students, while PA and OT students showed no change. Volunteering time to serve others decreased for OT and PA students, while BMS and BM students showed no change.

CONCLUSION

It is plausible that these findings emerge from differences in program curricula and specific training objectives. The findings provide initial insight to educators on ways that attitudes and behaviors pertaining to professionalism sometimes vary among students in different health science programs.

摘要

未标注

医疗保健领域的跨专业合作需要更好地理解学生对专业精神认知的共性与差异。

方法

来自五个专业项目(医师助理专业71人、物理治疗专业46人、职业治疗专业29人、临床心理学专业12人、生物医学科学专业59人)的217名学生完成了一项包含22个条目的调查(回复率79.5%)。采用从1(几乎从不)到5(总是)的李克特量表来评估专业态度和行为。

结果

一项混合模型多变量方差分析,并辅以事后分析,结果显示有5个项目存在显著的组间随时间的交互作用。生物医学科学专业学生对他人差异和多样性的敏感度增加,而物理治疗专业学生的敏感度下降。生物医学科学专业学生的及时性增加,而医师助理专业学生没有变化。生物医学科学专业学生寻求新学习体验的情况增加,而医师助理专业和物理治疗专业学生没有变化。生物医学科学专业学生担任团队领导角色的情况增加,物理治疗专业学生担任团队领导角色的情况减少,而医师助理专业和职业治疗专业学生没有变化。职业治疗专业和医师助理专业学生志愿为他人服务的时间减少,而生物医学科学专业和临床心理学专业学生没有变化。

结论

这些发现可能源于专业课程设置和特定培训目标的差异。这些发现为教育工作者提供了初步见解,让他们了解不同健康科学专业的学生在与专业精神相关的态度和行为方面有时会存在差异的方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验