Hauptmann Emily
J Hist Behav Sci. 2016 Spring;52(2):167-87. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21786. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
The Carnegie Corporation's role as a patron of the behavioral sciences has been overlooked; its support for the behavioral sciences not only began earlier than the Ford Foundation's but was also at least equally important to their success. I show how the close postwar collaboration between the Carnegie Corporation and the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) to promote the behavioral sciences emerged after a struggle between Carnegie and the Rockefeller Foundation over the direction and leadership of the SSRC. I then focus on three postwar projects Carnegie helped conceive and fund that were publicized as the work of the SSRC: Chase's The Proper Study of Mankind (1948), Stouffer et al.'s The American Soldier (), and the Michigan's Survey Research Center 1952 election study. In each of these projects, Carnegie deliberately muted its own role and promoted the remade SSRC as a major advocate for the behavioral sciences.
卡内基公司作为行为科学赞助者的角色一直被忽视;它对行为科学的支持不仅比福特基金会更早开始,而且对这些学科的成功至少同样重要。我展示了卡内基公司与社会科学研究理事会(SSRC)在战后为推动行为科学而进行的密切合作,是如何在卡内基公司与洛克菲勒基金会就SSRC的方向和领导权展开斗争之后出现的。然后,我重点关注卡内基公司帮助构思和资助的三个战后项目,这些项目被宣传为SSRC的工作成果:蔡斯的《人类的恰当研究》(1948年)、斯托弗等人的《美国士兵》(此处年份缺失)以及密歇根大学调查研究中心1952年的选举研究。在这些项目的每一个中,卡内基公司都刻意淡化自身角色,并将重塑后的SSRC宣传为行为科学的主要倡导者。