Fei Aihua, Cai Shengchao, Xu Bin
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2015 Nov;35(11):1099-102.
To compare the difference in clinical efficacy on post-stroke motor aphasia among the combined therapy of acupoint application of jieyu plaster and acupuncture, simple acupuncture and simple acupoint application of jieyu plaster.
Eighty-six patients of post-stroke motor aphasia were randomized into an acupuncture group (28 cases) , an acupoint application gruop (29 cases) and the combined therapy group (29 cases). In the acupuncture group, acupuncture was applied at the Speech No. 1 area and three-tongue needling points, once a day, 6 times a week. In the acupoint application group, jieyue plaster was applied to Yongquan (KI 1) and Laogong (PC 8), once a day, and the bilateral acupoints were selected alternatively. In the combined therapy group, the therapeutic methods of the first two groups were used in combination. The treatment lasted for 4 weeks in the three groups. The speech function score was observed and compared before and after treatment in the three groups and the efficacy was compared among the three groups.
The total effective rate was 86.2% (25/29) in the combined therapy group, which was better than 67.9% (19/28) in the acupuncture group and 69.0% (20/29) in the acupoint application group (both P < 0.05). After treatment, the scores of spontaneous conversation, restatement and nomenclature in the speech function were all improved as compared with those before treatment in the three groups (all P < 0.01). The results in the combined therapy group were apparently better than those in the acupuncture group and the acupoint application group (all P < 0.01).
The combined therapy of acupoint application of jieyu plaster and acupuncture apparently improves the speech function in the treatment of post-stroke motor aphasia and the efficacy is better than that of simple acupuncture or simple acupoint application.
比较解语膏穴位贴敷与针刺联合疗法、单纯针刺疗法、单纯解语膏穴位贴敷疗法对中风后运动性失语的临床疗效差异。
将86例中风后运动性失语患者随机分为针刺组(28例)、穴位贴敷组(29例)和联合治疗组(29例)。针刺组针刺言语一区及舌三针,每日1次,每周6次。穴位贴敷组将解语膏贴于涌泉穴(KI 1)和劳宫穴(PC 8),每日1次,双侧穴位交替选用。联合治疗组联合运用前两组的治疗方法。三组均治疗4周。观察比较三组治疗前后的言语功能评分,并比较三组疗效。
联合治疗组总有效率为86.2%(25/29),优于针刺组的67.9%(19/28)和穴位贴敷组的69.0%(20/29)(均P<0.05)。三组治疗后言语功能的自发谈话、复述、命名评分均较治疗前提高(均P<0.01)。联合治疗组的结果明显优于针刺组和穴位贴敷组(均P<0.01)。
解语膏穴位贴敷与针刺联合疗法在治疗中风后运动性失语时能明显改善言语功能,疗效优于单纯针刺或单纯穴位贴敷。