Cuervo Mary P, Lucia Lisa M, Castillo Alejandro
Center for Food Safety, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2471, USA; Merieux NutriSciences, Carretera al Campo Militar 305-B, Querétaro, Querétaro 76135, Mexico.
Center for Food Safety, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2471, USA.
J Food Prot. 2016 Mar;79(3):369-75. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-059.
Two outbreaks of salmonellosis were linked to the consumption of raw almonds from California in 2001 and 2004. As a result, federal regulations were developed, which mandate that all almonds grown in California must be treated with a process that results in a 4-log reduction of Salmonella. Because most of the technologies approved to treat almonds rely on the application of heat to control Salmonella, an evaluation of alternative technologies for inactivating heat-resistant Salmonella Enteritidis PT30 and Salmonella Senftenberg 775W was needed. In this study, almonds were inoculated with Salmonella Enteritidis PT30 and Salmonella Senftenberg 775W and then treated with an electron beam (e-beam) or by blanching or oil roasting. The irradiation D10-values for Salmonella Enteritidis PT30 and Salmonella Senftenberg 775W treated with e-beam were 0.90 and 0.72 kGy, respectively. For heat treatments, thermal D10-values for Salmonella Enteritidis PT30 and Salmonella Senftenberg 775W strains were 15.6 and 12.4 s, respectively, when subjected to blanching at 88°C and 13.2 and 10.9 s, respectively, when roasted in oil at 127 ± 2°C. No significant differences in irradiation and thermal treatment results were observed between Salmonella Enteritidis PT30 and Salmonella Senftenberg 775W (P > 0.05), indicating that e-beam irradiation may be a feasible technology for reducing Salmonella in almonds. However, the sensory changes resulting from irradiating at the doses used in this study must be evaluated before e-beam irradiation can be used as a nonthermal alternative for decontamination of almonds.
2001年和2004年,两起沙门氏菌病疫情与食用加利福尼亚州的生杏仁有关。因此,制定了联邦法规,规定加利福尼亚州种植的所有杏仁必须经过一种能使沙门氏菌数量减少4个对数级的处理过程。由于大多数被批准用于处理杏仁的技术都依赖于加热来控制沙门氏菌,所以需要评估用于灭活耐热肠炎沙门氏菌PT30和森夫滕贝格沙门氏菌775W的替代技术。在本研究中,将肠炎沙门氏菌PT30和森夫滕贝格沙门氏菌775W接种到杏仁上,然后用电子束(电子束)处理、烫漂或油烤。经电子束处理的肠炎沙门氏菌PT30和森夫滕贝格沙门氏菌775W的辐照D10值分别为0.90和0.72千戈瑞。对于热处理,肠炎沙门氏菌PT30和森夫滕贝格沙门氏菌775W菌株在88°C烫漂时的热D10值分别为15.6和12.4秒,在127±2°C油烤时分别为13.2和10.9秒。肠炎沙门氏菌PT30和森夫滕贝格沙门氏菌775W在辐照和热处理结果上没有显著差异(P>0.05),这表明电子束辐照可能是一种减少杏仁中沙门氏菌的可行技术。然而,在电子束辐照可作为杏仁非热去污替代方法使用之前,必须评估本研究中使用的剂量辐照引起的感官变化。