Poppes P, van der Putten A J J, Post W J, Vlaskamp C
Department of Special Needs Education and Youth Care, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Heeren Loo Zorggroep, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Jun;60(6):537-52. doi: 10.1111/jir.12268. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Several factors that correlate with the onset or continuation of challenging behaviour are mentioned in research. These are factors related to persons with ID, but also to direct support professionals and the context. Although many of these factors seem to affect the onset or continuation of challenging behaviour in people with ID in general, results are often inconclusive and have little focus on people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD). The present study aimed to assess the extent to which known factors related to challenging behaviour are also applicable to a group of 198 people with PIMD.
To determine which factors were associated with challenging behaviour, univariate analyses on associations between known risk factors and challenging behaviour were conducted. The associated factors were then subject to a regression analysis to determine the extent to which they explain the prevalence of challenging behaviour and can thus be seen as factors associated with challenging behaviour.
The results show that, in particular, factors concerning the personal characteristics of people with PIMD, such as sleeping problems and auditory problems, were related to the variance in mean frequency of challenging behaviour. Only one factor related to the direct support professionals was found: when these professionals had been offered training on the subject of challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities in general, they identified significantly more withdrawn behaviour. We found no contextual factors related to challenging behaviour.
These findings are generally consistent with findings reported in other studies, especially concerning the personal characteristics of people with PIMD. Further research should focus on the effects of providing safe auditory environments and appropriate sleep schedules for people with PIMD on the occurrence of challenging behaviour.
研究中提到了几个与挑战性行为的发生或持续相关的因素。这些因素既与智力残疾者有关,也与直接支持专业人员和环境有关。尽管其中许多因素似乎总体上会影响智力残疾者挑战性行为的发生或持续,但结果往往尚无定论,而且很少关注重度智力和多重残疾者(PIMD)。本研究旨在评估与挑战性行为相关的已知因素在多大程度上也适用于198名PIMD患者。
为了确定哪些因素与挑战性行为有关,对已知风险因素与挑战性行为之间的关联进行了单变量分析。然后对相关因素进行回归分析,以确定它们在多大程度上解释了挑战性行为的普遍性,从而可被视为与挑战性行为相关的因素。
结果表明,特别是与PIMD患者个人特征相关的因素,如睡眠问题和听觉问题,与挑战性行为平均频率的差异有关。仅发现一个与直接支持专业人员相关的因素:当这些专业人员接受了关于一般智力残疾者挑战性行为主题的培训时,他们识别出的退缩行为明显更多。我们未发现与挑战性行为相关的环境因素。
这些发现总体上与其他研究报告的结果一致,特别是关于PIMD患者的个人特征。进一步的研究应关注为PIMD患者提供安全的听觉环境和适当的睡眠时间表对挑战性行为发生的影响。