Department of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Histopathology, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Service Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 May;11(5):639-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.01.024. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Patients with lung cancer who harbor multiple pulmonary sites of disease have been challenging to classify; a subcommittee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee was charged with developing proposals for the eighth edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification to address this issue.
A systematic literature review and analysis of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer database was performed to develop proposals for revision in an iterative process involving multispecialty international input and review.
Details of the evidence base are summarized in other articles. Four patterns of disease are recognized; the clinical presentation, pathologic correlates, and biologic behavior of these suggest specific applications of the TNM classification rules. First, it is proposed that second primary lung cancers be designated with a T, N, and M category for each tumor. Second, tumors with a separate tumor nodule of the same histologic type (either suspected or proved) should be classified according to the location of the separate nodule relative to the index tumor-T3 for a same-lobe, T4 for a same-side (different lobe), and M1a for an other-side location-with a single N and M category. Third, multiple tumors with prominent ground glass (imaging) or lepidic (histologic) features should be designated by the T category of the highest T lesion, the number or m in parentheses (#/m) to indicate the multiplicity, and a collective N and M category for all. Finally, it is proposed that diffuse pneumonic-type lung cancers be designated by size (or T3) if in one lobe, T4 if involving multiple same-side lobes, and M1a if involving both lungs with a single N and M category for all areas of involvement.
We propose to tailor TNM classification of multiple pulmonary sites of lung cancer to reflect the unique aspects of four different patterns of presentation. We hope that this will lead to more consistent classification and clarity in communication and facilitate further research in the nature and optimal treatment of these entities.
患有多个肺部疾病部位的肺癌患者一直难以分类;国际肺癌研究协会分期和预后因素委员会的一个小组委员会负责制定第八版肿瘤、淋巴结和转移(TNM)分类的建议,以解决这个问题。
对国际肺癌研究协会数据库进行系统的文献回顾和分析,以在涉及多学科国际投入和审查的迭代过程中提出修订建议。
证据基础的详细信息总结在其他文章中。识别出四种疾病模式;这些疾病的临床表现、病理相关性和生物学行为表明 TNM 分类规则的具体应用。首先,建议为每个肿瘤指定第二个原发性肺癌的 T、N 和 M 类别。其次,具有相同组织类型的单独肿瘤结节(疑似或已证实)的肿瘤应根据单独结节相对于指数肿瘤的位置进行分类-T3 用于同叶、T4 用于同侧(不同叶)和 M1a 用于对侧位置-单个 N 和 M 类别。第三,多个具有明显磨玻璃(影像学)或贴壁(组织学)特征的肿瘤应通过最高 T 病变的 T 类别指定,括号中的数字或 m(#/m)表示多发性,并为所有病变指定一个集体 N 和 M 类别。最后,建议如果在一个肺叶中为弥漫性肺炎型肺癌指定大小(或 T3),如果涉及多个同侧肺叶则为 T4,如果涉及双肺则为 M1a,并为所有受累区域指定单个 N 和 M 类别。
我们建议根据四种不同表现模式的独特方面调整多个肺部肺癌的 TNM 分类。我们希望这将导致更一致的分类和更清晰的沟通,并促进对这些实体的性质和最佳治疗的进一步研究。