Suppr超能文献

XELOX(或 FOLFOX)诱导一线治疗转移性结直肠癌后的单药卡培他滨维持治疗:疗效和安全性的随机临床试验。

Single-agent capecitabine as maintenance therapy after induction of XELOX (or FOLFOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou.

Department of Medical Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Guangzhou.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1074-1081. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw101. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy of maintenance therapy for patients with mCRC is controversial. This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with capecitabine versus observation following inductive chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III trial, patients who received 18-24 weeks of induction chemotherapy with XELOX or FOLFOX and achieved disease control were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) to receive maintenance therapy of capecitabine or only observation until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization; the secondary end points included overall survival (OS), PFS from induction treatment (PFS2) and safety. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02027363.

RESULTS

Between 30 July 2010 and 15 September 2013, 274 patients were enrolled in the study from 11 sites in China and randomly assigned to maintenance group (n = 136) or observation group (n = 138). Clinicopathological characteristics were balanced in two groups. The median follow-up time from randomization was 29.0 months [interquartile range (IQR) 21-36 months]. The primary end point of PFS was statistically significantly longer in capecitabine maintenance group than in observation group {6.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.26-7.71] versus 3.43 (2.83-4.16) months, HR 0.54 (0.42-0.70), P < 0.001}. The median OS of capecitabine maintenance group was longer than that of observation group, but not statistically significant [25.63 (22.46-27.80) versus 23.30 (19.68-26.92) months; HR 0.85 (0.64-1.11), P = 0.2247]. Similar safety profiles were observed in both arms. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities in capecitabine maintenance group versus observation group were neutropenia, hand-foot syndrome, and mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance therapy with a single agent of capecitabine can be considered an appropriate option following the induction of XELOX or FOLFOX in mCRC patients with acceptable toxicities.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

NCT02027363.

摘要

背景

转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的维持治疗策略存在争议。本研究旨在评估卡培他滨维持治疗与诱导化疗后观察对转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效和安全性。

患者和方法

这是一项随机、开放标签、多中心、III 期临床试验,入组的患者接受 18-24 周的 XELOX 或 FOLFOX 诱导化疗,并达到疾病控制,随后进行中央随机分组(1:1),分别接受卡培他滨维持治疗或仅观察直至疾病进展。主要终点是随机分组后的无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、诱导治疗后的 PFS(PFS2)和安全性。分析采用意向治疗。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02027363。

结果

2010 年 7 月 30 日至 2013 年 9 月 15 日,从中国 11 个研究中心入组了 274 例患者,并随机分为维持治疗组(n=136)和观察组(n=138)。两组的临床病理特征均衡。随机分组后中位随访时间为 29.0 个月(IQR 21-36 个月)。卡培他滨维持治疗组的 PFS 主要终点显著长于观察组[6.43(95%CI 5.26-7.71)个月与 3.43(2.83-4.16)个月,HR 0.54(0.42-0.70),P<0.001]。卡培他滨维持治疗组的 OS 长于观察组,但无统计学意义[25.63(22.46-27.80)个月与 23.30(19.68-26.92)个月;HR 0.85(0.64-1.11),P=0.2247]。两组的安全性谱相似。卡培他滨维持治疗组与观察组最常见的 3 级或 4 级毒性为中性粒细胞减少、手足综合征和黏膜炎。

结论

XELOX 或 FOLFOX 诱导化疗后,卡培他滨单药维持治疗可作为转移性结直肠癌患者的一种合适选择,且毒性可接受。

临床试验编号

NCT02027363。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验