O'Sullivan Teresa A, Phillips Jennifer, Demaris Kendra
University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington.
Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, Illinois.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Feb 25;80(1):5. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8015.
To determine how medical literature evaluation (MLE) is being taught across the United States and to summarize methods for teaching and assessing MLE.
An 18-question survey was administered to faculty members whose primary responsibility was teaching MLE at schools and colleges of pharmacy.
Responses were received from 90 (71%) US schools of pharmacy. The most common method of integrating MLE into the curriculum was as a stand-alone course (49%). The most common placement was during the second professional year (43%) or integrated throughout the curriculum (25%). The majority (77%) of schools used a team-based approach. The use of active-learning strategies was common as was the use of multiple methods of evaluation. Responses varied regarding what role the course director played in incorporating MLE into advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs).
There is a trend toward incorporating MLE education components throughout the pre-APPE curriculum and placement of literature review/evaluation exercises into therapeutics practice skills laboratories to help students see how this skill integrates into other patient care skills. Several pre-APPE educational standards for MLE education exist, including journal club activities, a team-based approach to teaching and evaluation, and use of active-learning techniques.
确定美国各地如何教授医学文献评价(MLE),并总结MLE的教学和评估方法。
对主要负责在药学院校教授MLE的教员进行了一项包含18个问题的调查。
收到了来自90所(71%)美国药学院校的回复。将MLE纳入课程的最常见方法是作为一门独立课程(49%)。最常见的安排是在第二专业学年(43%)或贯穿整个课程(25%)。大多数学校(77%)采用基于团队的方法。主动学习策略的使用很普遍,多种评估方法的使用也是如此。关于课程主任在将MLE纳入高级药学实践经验(APPE)中所起的作用,回复各不相同。
存在一种趋势,即在APPE前的课程中纳入MLE教育内容,并将文献综述/评价练习安排到治疗实践技能实验室,以帮助学生了解这项技能如何与其他患者护理技能相结合。存在几项针对MLE教育的APPE前教育标准,包括期刊俱乐部活动、基于团队的教学和评估方法以及主动学习技术的使用。