Sakashita Taro, Kamishima Tamotsu, Kobayashi Yuto, Sugimori Hiroyuki, Tang Minghui, Sutherland Kenneth, Noguchi Atsushi, Kono Michihito, Atsumi Tatsuya
1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20151000. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20151000. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
To improve on the reproducibility and sensitivity of the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), two semi-automated measurement methods of the area of enhancing pannus (AEP), based on thresholding (AEP_THRES) and pixel-by-pixel time-intensity curve analysis (AEP_TIC), were evaluated as an alternative for the gold-standard manual contouring method (AEP_MANUAL).
8 patients (7 females and 1 male) with RA of the wrist or finger joints participated in the study. A three-dimensional contrast-enhanced dynamic sequence was used at 3 T. After identifying the most relevant time-intensity curve (TIC) shape in terms of synovitis by comparing with the synovitis score using the RA-MRI scoring system, three different approaches for measuring the AEP were performed. Spearman's test of rank correlation was used to compare AEPs via two semi-automated methods (AEP_THRES and AEP_TIC) against manual segmentation (AEP_MANUAL) in the entire hand region as well as the wrist and the finger regions.
The TIC shape of "washout after fast initial enhancement" had excellent correlation with synovitis score (r = 0.809). The correlation coefficient between AEP_TIC and AEP_MANUAL was evaluated to be better than that of AEP_THRES and AEP_MANUAL in the wrist region (AEP_THRES: r = 0.716, AEP_TIC: r = 0.815), whereas these were of comparable accuracy for the entire hand and the finger regions.
This study suggests that TIC analysis may be an alternative to manual contouring for pannus quantification and provides important clinical information of the extent of the disease in patients with RA.
TIC shape analysis can be applied for new quantitative assessment for RA synovitis in the wrist.
为提高类风湿关节炎(RA)患者评估的可重复性和敏感性,对基于阈值法(AEP_THRES)和逐像素时间-强度曲线分析(AEP_TIC)的两种半自动化血管翳强化面积(AEP)测量方法进行评估,以替代金标准手动勾勒轮廓法(AEP_MANUAL)。
8例腕关节或手指关节RA患者(7例女性,1例男性)参与本研究。在3T条件下采用三维对比增强动态序列。通过与使用RA-MRI评分系统的滑膜炎评分进行比较,确定最能反映滑膜炎的时间-强度曲线(TIC)形状后,采用三种不同方法测量AEP。采用Spearman等级相关检验,比较两种半自动化方法(AEP_THRES和AEP_TIC)与手动分割法(AEP_MANUAL)在整个手部区域以及腕部和手指区域的AEP。
“快速初始强化后廓清”的TIC形状与滑膜炎评分具有良好的相关性(r = 0.809)。在腕部区域,AEP_TIC与AEP_MANUAL的相关系数优于AEP_THRES与AEP_MANUAL的相关系数(AEP_THRES:r = 0.716,AEP_TIC:r = 0.815),而在整个手部和手指区域,二者准确性相当。
本研究表明,TIC分析可作为血管翳定量的手动勾勒轮廓法的替代方法,并为RA患者提供重要的疾病范围临床信息。
TIC形状分析可用于腕部RA滑膜炎的新定量评估。