Eftekhary Nima, Nwosu Kenneth, McCoy Eric, Fukunaga Dudley, Rolfe Kevin
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York;
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Torrance;
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jul;25(1):110-3. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.SPINE151022. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
OBJECTIVE Penetrating gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the spinal column are stable injuries and do not require spinal orthoses or bracing postinjury. Nonetheless, a high number of GSW-related spinal cord injury (SCI) patients are referred with a brace to national rehabilitation centers. Unnecessary bracing may encumber rehabilitation, create skin breakdown or pressure ulcers, and add excessive costs. The aim of this study was to confirm the stability of spinal column injuries from GSWs and quantify the overutilization rate of bracing based on long-term follow-up. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was performed at a nationally renowned rehabilitation center. In total, 487 GSW-related SCI patients were transferred for rehabilitation and identified over the last 14 years. Retrospective chart review and telephone interviews were conducted to identify patients who were braced at the initial treating institution and determine if late instability, deformity, or neurological deterioration resulted in secondary surgery or intervention. In addition, 396 unoperated patients were available for analysis after 91 patients were excluded for undergoing an initial destabilizing surgical dissection or laminectomy, thereby altering the natural history of the injury. All of these 396 patients who presented with a brace had bracing discontinued upon reaching the facility. RESULTS In total, 203 of 396 patients were transferred with a spinal brace, demonstrating an overutilization rate of 51%. No patients deteriorated neurologically or needed later surgery for spinal column deformity or instability attributable to the injury. All patients had stable injuries. The patterns of injury and severity of neurological injury did not vary between patients who were initially braced or unbraced. The average follow-up was 7.8 years (range 1-14 years) and the average age was 25 years (range 10-62 years). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of brace overutilization for penetrating GSW-related SCI was 51%. Long-term follow-up in this study confirmed that these injuries were stable and thus did not require bracing. No patients deteriorated neurologically, whether or not they were initially braced. The unnecessary use of spinal orthoses increases costs and patient morbidity. Reeducation and dissemination of this information is warranted.
目的 脊柱穿透性枪伤(GSWs)属于稳定性损伤,伤后无需使用脊柱矫形器或支具。尽管如此,仍有大量与GSW相关的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者戴着支具被转送至国家康复中心。不必要的支具使用可能会妨碍康复进程,导致皮肤破损或压疮,并增加额外费用。本研究的目的是通过长期随访来确认GSW所致脊柱损伤的稳定性,并量化支具的过度使用率。方法 这项回顾性队列研究在一家全国知名的康复中心进行。在过去14年里,共纳入了487例与GSW相关的SCI患者进行康复治疗并予以识别。通过回顾病历和电话访谈,确定在初始治疗机构佩戴支具的患者,并判断后期的不稳定、畸形或神经功能恶化是否导致了二次手术或干预。此外,在排除91例因接受初始的去稳定化手术解剖或椎板切除术而改变损伤自然病程的患者后,有396例未接受手术的患者可供分析。所有这396例戴着支具前来就诊的患者在到达该机构后均停止了支具使用。结果 在396例患者中,共有203例戴着脊柱支具被转送来,过度使用率为51%。没有患者出现神经功能恶化,也没有患者因损伤导致的脊柱畸形或不稳定而需要后期手术。所有患者的损伤都是稳定的。初始佩戴支具或未佩戴支具的患者之间,损伤模式和神经损伤严重程度并无差异。平均随访时间为7.8年(范围1 - 14年),平均年龄为25岁(范围10 - 62岁)。结论 与穿透性GSW相关的SCI患者支具过度使用率为51%。本研究的长期随访证实这些损伤是稳定的,因此无需使用支具。无论最初是否佩戴支具,均没有患者出现神经功能恶化。脊柱矫形器的不必要使用会增加成本和患者发病率。有必要对这一信息进行再教育和传播。