Álvarez-Arenal Ángel, Segura-Mori Luis, Gonzalez-Gonzalez Ignacio, DeLlanos-Lanchares Hector, Sanchez-Lasheras Fernando, Ellacuria-Echevarria Joseba
Department of Prosthodontics and Occlusion, School of Dentistry, University of Oviedo, C/. Catedratico Serrano s/n, 33006, Oviedo, Spain.
, C/. Blasco de Garay 94, 28003, Madrid, Spain.
Odontology. 2017 Jan;105(1):68-75. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0237-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
A 3D finite element analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone (transitional cortical and trabecular bone) of one single implant-supported crown with platform switching and another without platform switching, under a vertical and an oblique load. Two models were created, simulating an osseointegrated implant (4 × 13 mm, platform 4.1 mm) embedded in the jaw bone. One model simulated a 4.1-mm diameter abutment connection (conventional model) and the other a 3.8-mm diameter abutment connection (platform-switching model). A crown with a Co-Cr alloy framework and feldspathic porcelain veneering was applied over the titanium abutment. Static, vertical and oblique loads (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°) with a maximum value of 150 N were applied to the crown. For any inclination of the applied load, the stress values in the transitional cortical bone were lower in the platform-switching model than in the conventional model. However, the stress in the transitional trabecular bone was higher in the platform-switching model than in the conventional model. Stress values increased when the load was more oblique at the transitional cortical bone in both models and was slightly reduced at the transitional trabecular bone of the conventional model. The platform-switching technique reduces the stress at the transitional cortical bone. In both models, this stress gradually increases as the load becomes more inclined. The transitional trabecular bone shows lower stress values than the transitional cortical bone. The location of stress is similar in both models.
进行了三维有限元分析,以评估和比较在垂直和斜向载荷下,一个采用平台转换的单颗种植体支持冠和另一个未采用平台转换的种植体支持冠在种植体周围骨(过渡性皮质骨和小梁骨)中的应力分布。创建了两个模型,模拟植入颌骨中的骨结合种植体(4×13毫米,平台4.1毫米)。一个模型模拟4.1毫米直径的基台连接(传统模型),另一个模拟3.8毫米直径的基台连接(平台转换模型)。在钛基台上应用了带有钴铬合金框架和长石质瓷贴面的冠。对冠施加最大值为150 N的静态、垂直和斜向载荷(0°、15°、30°、45°)。对于所施加载荷的任何倾斜度,平台转换模型中过渡性皮质骨的应力值均低于传统模型。然而,平台转换模型中过渡性小梁骨的应力高于传统模型。在两个模型中,当载荷在过渡性皮质骨处更倾斜时,应力值增加,而在传统模型的过渡性小梁骨处应力略有降低。平台转换技术可降低过渡性皮质骨处的应力。在两个模型中,随着载荷变得更倾斜,这种应力会逐渐增加。过渡性小梁骨的应力值低于过渡性皮质骨。两个模型中的应力位置相似。