Swank Morgan L, Garite Thomas J, Maurel Kimberly, Das Anita, Perlow Jordan H, Combs C Andrew, Fishman Shira, Vanderhoeven Jeroen, Nageotte Michael, Bush Melissa, Lewis David
University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA.
University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA; Mednax/Pediatrix Medical Group, Sunrise, FL.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):223.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.044. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Vasa previa is a rare condition that is associated with a high rate of fetal or neonatal death when not diagnosed antenatally. The majority of available studies are either small, do not include antepartum data, limited to single institutions, or are biased by inclusion of patients from registries and online vasa previa support groups.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and management strategies for this potentially catastrophic entity and to describe further maternal and placental risk factors that may aid in the establishment of a screening protocol for vasa previa.
This was a retrospective multicenter descriptive study that included all pregnancies that were complicated by vasa previa that delivered between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012. Nine maternal fetal medicine practices and the hospitals in which they practice participated in data collection of diagnosis, treatment, and maternal-neonatal outcomes.
Sixty-eight pregnancies were identified that included the diagnosis of vasa previa or "possible vasa previa" either in the ultrasound record or in the hospital record at the time of delivery. Four cases (5.8%) appeared to resolve on repeat ultrasound examination. Fifteen of the 64 cases that were suspected of having vasa previa could not be verified or were not documented at delivery. Of the remaining 49 cases, where vasa previa was documented, 47 cases (96%) were diagnosed by ultrasound scanning antenatally. Known risk factors for vasa previa were present in 41 of 47 cases (87%). Of the 49 cases, 41 were delivered by planned cesarean delivery at a mean gestational age of 34.7 weeks, and 8 cases required emergent cesarean delivery at a mean gestational age of 34.6 weeks (range, 32.4-36.0 weeks gestation). Seven of these emergent cesarean deliveries had been diagnosed previously; 1 case had not. All of the emergent cesarean deliveries were for vaginal bleeding; 1 case was also for a concerning fetal heart rate, but only 1 of the known cases had a documented ruptured fetal vessel. None of these cases were found to have cervical shortening before the onset of bleeding. One of the undiagnosed cases resulted in a ruptured fetal vessel and a baby with no heart beat at birth who survived but had periventricular leukomalacia at 1 month of age with mild white-matter atrophy. Of the remaining neonates in this group, there were no deaths and no major complications beyond mild respiratory distress syndrome in 9 cases. There were no other major neonatal complications, which included no cases of periventricular leukomalacia, neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, or any grade of intraventricular hemorrhage in the confirmed cases of vasa previa.
This study confirms most current recommendations that include risk-based ultrasound screening, early hospitalization at 30-34 weeks gestation, antenatal corticosteroids at 30-32 weeks gestation, and elective delivery at 33-34 weeks gestation. Thus, with these recommendations for current identification and management of vasa previa in this series of geographically diverse mostly private practice maternal fetal medicine practices, we have confirmed recent reports that show a dramatic improvement in neonatal survival and complications compared with earlier reports.
前置血管是一种罕见情况,若产前未诊断出来,胎儿或新生儿死亡率很高。现有的大多数研究规模较小,未纳入产前数据,局限于单一机构,或者因纳入登记处及前置血管在线支持小组的患者而存在偏差。
本研究旨在调查针对这种潜在灾难性情况的诊断和管理策略,并描述可能有助于建立前置血管筛查方案的更多母体和胎盘危险因素。
这是一项回顾性多中心描述性研究,纳入了2000年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间所有并发前置血管并分娩的妊娠。九家母胎医学机构及其所在医院参与了诊断、治疗及母儿结局的数据收集。
共识别出68例妊娠,这些妊娠在超声记录或分娩时的医院记录中被诊断为前置血管或“可能的前置血管”。4例(5.8%)经重复超声检查似乎已消失。64例疑似前置血管的病例中有15例在分娩时无法核实或未记录在案。在其余49例记录有前置血管的病例中,47例(96%)通过产前超声扫描诊断出来。47例中有41例(87%)存在已知的前置血管危险因素。49例中,41例在平均孕周34.7周时通过计划剖宫产分娩,8例在平均孕周34.6周(孕周范围32.4 - 36.0周)时需要紧急剖宫产。这些紧急剖宫产中有7例之前已被诊断;1例未被诊断。所有紧急剖宫产均因阴道出血;1例还因胎儿心率异常,但已知病例中只有1例记录有胎儿血管破裂。这些病例在出血发作前均未发现宫颈缩短。1例未诊断出的病例导致胎儿血管破裂,出生时婴儿无心跳,虽存活但在1月龄时患有脑室周围白质软化症及轻度白质萎缩。该组其余新生儿均无死亡,除9例有轻度呼吸窘迫综合征外无其他严重并发症。在确诊的前置血管病例中无其他严重新生儿并发症,包括无脑室周围白质软化症、新生儿败血症、坏死性小肠结肠炎或任何级别的脑室内出血病例。
本研究证实了当前的大多数建议,包括基于风险的超声筛查、妊娠30 - 34周时提前住院、妊娠30 - 32周时使用产前糖皮质激素以及妊娠33 - 34周时择期分娩。因此,通过这些针对本系列地理分布多样且大多为私人执业的母胎医学机构中当前前置血管识别和管理的建议,我们证实了近期报告,即与早期报告相比,新生儿存活率和并发症有显著改善。