Lattanzi Simona, Cagnetti Claudia, Foschi Nicoletta, Provinciali Leandro, Silvestrini Mauro
From the Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Neurology. 2016 Apr 5;86(14):1344-1352. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002545. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new antiepileptic drug brivaracetam (BRV) as add-on treatment for drug-resistant partial epilepsy using meta-analytical techniques.
Randomized, placebo-controlled, single- or double-blind, add-on trials of BRV in adult patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy were identified through a systematic literature search. The following outcomes were assessed: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, seizure freedom, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and treatment withdrawal. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval was estimated for each outcome.
Six trials were included involving 2,399 participants according to the intent-to-treat, 1,715 for BRV, and 684 for placebo groups, respectively. The pooled RRs for the 50% responders and seizure freedom were 1.79 (1.51-2.12) and 4.74 (2.00-11.25), respectively. The subanalysis by levetiracetam (LEV) status did not show a statistically significant difference in the 50% responder rate when comparing BRV with placebo in patients with concomitant assumption of LEV. The TEAEs significantly associated with BRV were irritability (2.99 [1.28-6.97]), fatigue (2.19 [1.44-3.33]), somnolence (1.97 [1.45-2.68]), and dizziness (1.66 [1.19-2.31]). The overall RRs for treatment withdrawal due to TEAEs or any reason were 1.58 (1.04-2.40) and 1.27 (0.93-1.73), respectively.
In adults with drug-refractory focal epilepsy, add-on BRV was effective to reduce seizure frequency and fairly well-tolerated. Further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions about its efficacy in non-LEV-naive participants and evaluate its long-term safety profile.
采用荟萃分析技术评估新型抗癫痫药物布立西坦(BRV)作为耐药性部分性癫痫附加治疗的疗效和安全性。
通过系统的文献检索,确定了在成年耐药性部分性癫痫患者中进行的BRV随机、安慰剂对照、单盲或双盲附加试验。评估以下结果:癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多、无癫痫发作、治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)发生率以及治疗停药情况。对每个结果估计风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间。
根据意向性分析,纳入了6项试验,共2399名参与者,其中BRV组1715名,安慰剂组684名。50%应答者和无癫痫发作的合并RR分别为1.79(1.51 - 2.12)和4.74(2.00 - 11.25)。在同时服用左乙拉西坦(LEV)的患者中,将BRV与安慰剂进行比较时,按LEV状态进行的亚分析显示50%应答率无统计学显著差异。与BRV显著相关的TEAE有易怒(2.99 [1.28 - 6.97])、疲劳(2.19 [1.44 - 3.33])、嗜睡(1.97 [1.45 - 2.68])和头晕(1.66 [1.19 - 2.31])。因TEAE或任何原因导致治疗停药的总体RR分别为1.58(1.04 - 2.40)和1.27(0.93 - 1.73)。
在成年药物难治性局灶性癫痫患者中,附加BRV可有效降低癫痫发作频率且耐受性较好。需要进一步研究以得出关于其在非初治LEV参与者中疗效的确切结论,并评估其长期安全性。