Suppr超能文献

添加布立伏西坦治疗难治性局灶性癫痫:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Brivaracetam add-on for refractory focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lattanzi Simona, Cagnetti Claudia, Foschi Nicoletta, Provinciali Leandro, Silvestrini Mauro

机构信息

From the Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Neurology. 2016 Apr 5;86(14):1344-1352. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002545. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new antiepileptic drug brivaracetam (BRV) as add-on treatment for drug-resistant partial epilepsy using meta-analytical techniques.

METHODS

Randomized, placebo-controlled, single- or double-blind, add-on trials of BRV in adult patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy were identified through a systematic literature search. The following outcomes were assessed: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, seizure freedom, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and treatment withdrawal. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval was estimated for each outcome.

RESULTS

Six trials were included involving 2,399 participants according to the intent-to-treat, 1,715 for BRV, and 684 for placebo groups, respectively. The pooled RRs for the 50% responders and seizure freedom were 1.79 (1.51-2.12) and 4.74 (2.00-11.25), respectively. The subanalysis by levetiracetam (LEV) status did not show a statistically significant difference in the 50% responder rate when comparing BRV with placebo in patients with concomitant assumption of LEV. The TEAEs significantly associated with BRV were irritability (2.99 [1.28-6.97]), fatigue (2.19 [1.44-3.33]), somnolence (1.97 [1.45-2.68]), and dizziness (1.66 [1.19-2.31]). The overall RRs for treatment withdrawal due to TEAEs or any reason were 1.58 (1.04-2.40) and 1.27 (0.93-1.73), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with drug-refractory focal epilepsy, add-on BRV was effective to reduce seizure frequency and fairly well-tolerated. Further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions about its efficacy in non-LEV-naive participants and evaluate its long-term safety profile.

摘要

目的

采用荟萃分析技术评估新型抗癫痫药物布立西坦(BRV)作为耐药性部分性癫痫附加治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

通过系统的文献检索,确定了在成年耐药性部分性癫痫患者中进行的BRV随机、安慰剂对照、单盲或双盲附加试验。评估以下结果:癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多、无癫痫发作、治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)发生率以及治疗停药情况。对每个结果估计风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间。

结果

根据意向性分析,纳入了6项试验,共2399名参与者,其中BRV组1715名,安慰剂组684名。50%应答者和无癫痫发作的合并RR分别为1.79(1.51 - 2.12)和4.74(2.00 - 11.25)。在同时服用左乙拉西坦(LEV)的患者中,将BRV与安慰剂进行比较时,按LEV状态进行的亚分析显示50%应答率无统计学显著差异。与BRV显著相关的TEAE有易怒(2.99 [1.28 - 6.97])、疲劳(2.19 [1.44 - 3.33])、嗜睡(1.97 [1.45 - 2.68])和头晕(1.66 [1.19 - 2.31])。因TEAE或任何原因导致治疗停药的总体RR分别为1.58(1.04 - 2.40)和1.27(0.93 - 1.73)。

结论

在成年药物难治性局灶性癫痫患者中,附加BRV可有效降低癫痫发作频率且耐受性较好。需要进一步研究以得出关于其在非初治LEV参与者中疗效的确切结论,并评估其长期安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验