Suppr超能文献

拉莫三嗪添加治疗耐药性部分性癫痫。

Lamotrigine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

作者信息

Ramaratnam Sridharan, Panebianco Mariangela, Marson Anthony G

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Nerve Centre, 5/1 Rajachar Street, T Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600017.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 22;2016(6):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 1.Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, affecting almost 0.5% to 1% of the population. For nearly 30% of these people, their epilepsy is refractory to currently available drugs. Pharmacological treatment remains the first choice to control epilepsy. Lamotrigine is one of the newer antiepileptic drugs and is the topic of this review. Lamotrigine in combination with other antiepileptic drugs (add-on) can reduce seizures, but with some adverse effects. The aim of this systematic review was to overview the current evidence for the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine when used as an adjunctive treatment for people with refractory partial epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of lamotrigine on (1) seizures, (2) adverse effect profile, and (3) cognition and quality of life, compared to placebo controls, when used as an add-on treatment for people with refractory partial epilepsy.

SEARCH METHODS

For the previous version of the review, the authors searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (January 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2010), and reference lists of articles.For this update, we searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (28 May 2015), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 4), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to May 2015), and reference lists of articles. We also contacted the manufacturers of lamotrigine (GlaxoSmithKline). No language restrictions were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy of any age, in which an adequate method of concealment of randomisation was used. The studies were double-, single- or unblinded. For cross-over studies, the first treatment period was treated as a parallel trial. Eligible participants were adults or children with drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, two review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion, and extracted data. Outcomes included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal (any reason), adverse effects, effects on cognition and quality of life. Primary analyses were by intention-to-treat. Sensitivity best and worse case analyses were undertaken to account for missing outcome data. Pooled Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) were estimated for the primary outcomes of seizure frequency and treatment withdrawal. For adverse effects, pooled RRs and 99% Cls were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any new studies for this update, therefore, the results are unchanged.For the previous version of the review, the authors found five parallel add-on studies and eight cross-over studies in adults or children with refractory focal epilepsy, and one parallel add-on study with a responder-enriched design in infants. In total, these 14 studies included 1958 participants (38 infants, 199 children, and 1721 adults). Baseline phases ranged from 4 to 12 weeks; treatment phases from 8 to 36 weeks. Overall, eleven studies (n = 1243 participants) were rated as having a low risk of bias, and three (n = 715 participants) had un unclear risk of bias due to lack of reported information around study design. Effective blinding of studies was reported in three studies (n = 504 participants). The overall risk ratio (RR) for 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was 1.80 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.23; 12 RCTs) for twelve studies (n = 1322 participants, adults and children) indicating that lamotrigine was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing seizure frequency. The overall RR for treatment withdrawal (for any reason) was 1.11 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.36; 14 RCTs) for fourteen studies (n = 1958 participants). The adverse events significantly associated with lamotrigine were: ataxia, dizziness, diplopia, and nausea. The RR of these adverse effects were as follows: ataxia 3.34 (99% Cl 2.01 to 5.55; 12 RCTs; n = 1524); dizziness 2.00 (99% Cl 1.51 to 2.64;13 RCTs; n = 1767); diplopia 3.79 (99% Cl 2.15 to 6.68; 3 RCTs; n = 943); nausea 1.81 (99% Cl 1.22 to 2.68; 12 RCTs; n = 1486). The limited data available precluded any conclusions about effects on cognition and quality of life. No important heterogeneity between studies was found for any of the outcomes. Overall, we assessed the evidence as high to moderate quality, due to incomplete data for some outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine as an add-on treatment for partial seizures appears to be effective in reducing seizure frequency, and seems to be fairly well tolerated. However, the trials were of relatively short duration and provided no evidence for the long-term. Further trials are needed to assess the long-term effects of lamotrigine, and to compare it with other add-on drugs.Since we did not find any new studies, our conclusions remain unchanged.

摘要

背景

这是发表于《考科蓝系统评价》2010年第1期的考科蓝综述的更新版本。癫痫是一种常见的神经系统疾病,影响着近0.5%至1%的人口。在这些人中,近30%的患者的癫痫对现有药物难治。药物治疗仍然是控制癫痫的首选。拉莫三嗪是较新的抗癫痫药物之一,也是本综述的主题。拉莫三嗪与其他抗癫痫药物联合使用(添加治疗)可减少癫痫发作,但有一些不良反应。本系统评价的目的是概述拉莫三嗪作为难治性部分性癫痫患者辅助治疗时的疗效和耐受性的现有证据。

目的

确定拉莫三嗪作为难治性部分性癫痫患者的添加治疗时,与安慰剂对照相比,对(1)癫痫发作、(2)不良反应、(3)认知和生活质量的影响。

检索方法

对于该综述的上一版本,作者检索了考科蓝癫痫小组专业注册库(2010年1月)、考科蓝对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,《考科蓝系统评价》2010年第1期)、MEDLINE(1950年至2010年1月)以及文章的参考文献列表。对于本次更新,我们检索了考科蓝癫痫小组专业注册库(2015年5月28日)、CENTRAL(《考科蓝系统评价》2015年第4期)、MEDLINE(Ovid,1946年至2015年5月)以及文章的参考文献列表。我们还联系了拉莫三嗪的制造商(葛兰素史克)。未设语言限制。

入选标准

对任何年龄的耐药性部分性癫痫患者进行的随机安慰剂对照试验,其中采用了适当的随机分配隐藏方法。这些研究为双盲、单盲或非盲研究。对于交叉研究,将第一个治疗期视为平行试验。符合条件的参与者为患有耐药性部分性癫痫的成人或儿童。

数据收集与分析

对于本次更新,两名综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入,并提取数据。结局包括癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多、因任何原因退出治疗、不良反应、对认知和生活质量的影响。主要分析采用意向性分析。进行敏感性最佳和最差情况分析以处理缺失的结局数据。对癫痫发作频率和退出治疗的主要结局估计合并风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(95%CI)。对于不良反应,计算合并RR及99%CI。

主要结果

本次更新我们未识别到任何新研究,因此结果未变。对于该综述的上一版本,作者在患有难治性局灶性癫痫的成人或儿童中发现了五项平行添加治疗研究和八项交叉研究,以及一项在婴儿中采用富集反应者设计的平行添加治疗研究。总共,这14项研究纳入了1958名参与者(38名婴儿、199名儿童和1721名成人)。基线期为4至12周;治疗期为8至36周。总体而言,11项研究(n = 1243名参与者)被评为偏倚风险低,3项研究(n = 715名参与者)因缺乏关于研究设计的报告信息而偏倚风险不明确。三项研究(n = 504名参与者)报告了有效的盲法。十二项研究(n = 1322名参与者,成人和儿童)中癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多的总体风险比(RR)为1.80(95%CI 1.45至2.23;12项随机对照试验),表明拉莫三嗪在降低癫痫发作频率方面显著优于安慰剂。十四项研究(n = 1958名参与者)中因任何原因退出治疗的总体RR为1.11(95%CI 0.90至1.36;14项随机对照试验)。与拉莫三嗪显著相关的不良事件为:共济失调、头晕、复视和恶心。这些不良反应的RR如下:共济失调3.34(99%CI 2.01至5.55;12项随机对照试验;n = 1524);头晕2.00(99%CI 1.51至2.64;第13项随机对照试验;n = 1767);复视3.79(99%CI 2.15至6.68;3项随机对照试验;n = 943);恶心1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验