Stratmann A, Fröhlich E K F, Gebhardt-Henrich S G, Harlander-Matauschek A, Würbel H, Toscano M J
Center for Proper Housing: Poultry and Rabbits (ZTHZ), Division of Animal Welfare, VPH Institute, University of Bern, Burgerweg 22, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland
Center for Proper Housing: Poultry and Rabbits (ZTHZ), Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Burgerweg 22, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
Poult Sci. 2016 May;95(5):975-84. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew026. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
The prevalence of keel bone damage as well as external egg parameters of 2 pure lines divergently selected for high (H) and low (L) bone strength were investigated in 2 aviary systems under commercial conditions. A standard LSL hybrid was used as a reference group. Birds were kept mixed per genetic line (77 hens of the H and L line and 201 or 206 hens of the LSL line, respectively, per pen) in 8 pens of 2 aviary systems differing in design. Keel bone status and body mass of 20 focal hens per line and pen were assessed at 17, 18, 23, 30, 36, 43, 52, and 63 wk of age. External egg parameters (i.e., egg mass, eggshell breaking strength, thickness, and mass) were measured using 10 eggs per line at both 38 and 57 wk of age. Body parameters (i.e. tarsus and third primary wing feather length to calculate index of wing loading) were recorded at 38 wk of age and mortality per genetic line throughout the laying cycle. Bone mineral density (BMD) of 15 keel bones per genetic line was measured after slaughter to confirm assignment of the experimental lines. We found a greater BMD in the H compared with the L and LSL lines. Fewer keel bone fractures and deviations, a poorer external egg quality, as well as a lower index of wing loading were found in the H compared with the L line. Mortality was lower and production parameters (e.g., laying performance) were higher in the LSL line compared with the 2 experimental lines. Aviary design affected prevalence of keel bone damage, body mass, and mortality. We conclude that selection of specific bone traits associated with bone strength as well as the related differences in body morphology (i.e., lower index of wing loading) have potential to reduce keel bone damage in commercial settings. Also, the housing environment (i.e., aviary design) may have additive effects.
在商业条件下的两种禽舍系统中,对两个分别针对高(H)和低(L)骨强度进行了差异选择的纯系鸡的龙骨损伤患病率以及蛋的外部参数进行了研究。一个标准的LSL杂交种用作参考组。每个遗传系的鸡混合饲养(每栏分别有77只H系和L系母鸡以及201只或206只LSL系母鸡),饲养在两个设计不同的禽舍系统的8个栏中。在17、18、23、30、36、43、52和63周龄时,评估每个系和栏中20只重点母鸡的龙骨状态和体重。在38周龄和57周龄时,每个系使用10枚蛋测量蛋的外部参数(即蛋重、蛋壳破裂强度、厚度和重量)。在38周龄时记录身体参数(即跗骨和第三根初级飞羽长度以计算翼载荷指数),并记录整个产蛋周期每个遗传系的死亡率。屠宰后测量每个遗传系15根龙骨的骨矿物质密度(BMD)以确认实验系的分配。我们发现H系的BMD高于L系和LSL系。与L系相比,H系的龙骨骨折和畸形较少,蛋的外部品质较差,翼载荷指数较低。与两个实验系相比,LSL系的死亡率较低,生产参数(如产蛋性能)较高。禽舍设计影响龙骨损伤的患病率、体重和死亡率。我们得出结论,选择与骨强度相关的特定骨性状以及身体形态的相关差异(即较低的翼载荷指数)有可能在商业环境中减少龙骨损伤。此外,饲养环境(即禽舍设计)可能具有累加效应。