Suppr超能文献

回归模型与分类风险调整模型的属性比较

Comparison of the Properties of Regression and Categorical Risk-Adjustment Models.

作者信息

Fuller Richard L, Averill Richard F, Muldoon John H, Hughes John S

机构信息

3M Health Information Systems Silver Spring, Maryland (Mr Fuller, Mr Averill, and Mr Muldoon); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Dr Hughes).

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 2016 Apr-Jun;39(2):157-65. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000135.

Abstract

Clinical risk-adjustment, the ability to standardize the comparison of individuals with different health needs, is based upon 2 main alternative approaches: regression models and clinical categorical models. In this article, we examine the impact of the differences in the way these models are constructed on end user applications.

摘要

临床风险调整是一种对具有不同健康需求的个体进行比较标准化的能力,它基于两种主要的替代方法:回归模型和临床分类模型。在本文中,我们研究了这些模型构建方式的差异对终端用户应用的影响。

相似文献

2
Medicare 2000.
Md Med. 2001 Spring;2(2):21-4.
5
When methods meet politics: how risk adjustment became part of Medicare managed care.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Jun;30(3):475-504. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-3-475.
7
1998 IMS legislative priorities adopted.
Iowa Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;87(9):347-8.
8
Managed care policy regarding OMT reimbursement illogical.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002 Feb;102(2):66.
9
Risk adjustment wrinkle.风险调整难题。
Med Netw Strategy Rep. 1999 Jan;8(1):1-5.
10
Risk adjustment or risk avoidance?风险调整还是风险规避?
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 24;339(26):1925-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812243392609.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验