Kamhieh Y, Fox H
ENT Department, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, Wales, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Dec;41(6):771-776. doi: 10.1111/coa.12645. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
The role of tranexamic acid in the management of epistaxis remains unclear. There is uncertainty about its safety and about the contraindications for its use. We performed a systematic review of the use of systemic and topical tranexamic acid in epistaxis and a comparative review of its use in other specialties.
This review assesses and summarises the existing evidence for the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in the management of epistaxis.
Systematic review.
MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for 'epistaxis' and equivalent MESH terms, combined with the Boolean operator 'OR' and 'tranexamic acid'. The Cochrane library and society guidelines were reviewed for evidence regarding the use of tranexamic acid in other specialties.
All five relevant RCTs were included in the review and were evaluated according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews.
Three RCTS pertained to spontaneous epistaxis; of these, one trial found no benefit of oral tranexamic acid in acute epistaxis, one trial found no significant benefit of topical tranexamic acid, but the largest of the trials showed significant benefit of topical tranexamic acid in acute epistaxis management. Two RCTs examined oral tranexamic acid for prophylaxis of recurrent epistaxes in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia; both showed significant reduction in severity and frequency.
Tranexamic acid, as a WHO 'essential medicine', is a powerful, readily available tool, the use of which in epistaxis has been limited by uncertainty over its efficacy and its safety profile. This systematic review summarises the existing evidence and extrapolates from the wealth of data for other specialties to address the clinical question - does TXA have a role in epistaxis management?
氨甲环酸在鼻出血治疗中的作用仍不明确。其安全性及使用禁忌尚存在不确定性。我们对全身性和局部性氨甲环酸在鼻出血治疗中的应用进行了系统评价,并对其在其他专科中的应用进行了比较性评价。
本综述评估并总结了氨甲环酸在鼻出血治疗中疗效和安全性的现有证据。
系统评价。
在MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中检索“鼻出血”及等效的医学主题词,与布尔运算符“OR”及“氨甲环酸”相结合。查阅Cochrane图书馆及学会指南,以获取氨甲环酸在其他专科应用的证据。
本综述纳入了全部五项相关随机对照试验,并根据《Cochrane系统评价手册》的建议进行评价。
三项随机对照试验涉及自发性鼻出血;其中,一项试验发现口服氨甲环酸对急性鼻出血无益处,一项试验发现局部用氨甲环酸无显著益处,但规模最大的试验显示局部用氨甲环酸在急性鼻出血治疗中有显著益处。两项随机对照试验研究了口服氨甲环酸对遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症患者复发性鼻出血的预防作用;两者均显示严重程度和发作频率显著降低。
氨甲环酸作为世界卫生组织的“基本药物”,是一种强效且易于获取的工具,但其在鼻出血治疗中的应用因对其疗效和安全性的不确定性而受到限制。本系统评价总结了现有证据,并从其他专科的大量数据中进行推断,以解决临床问题——氨甲环酸在鼻出血治疗中是否有作用?