Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, CSIC, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, E-08193, Spain.
CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Catalonia, E-08193, Spain.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2570-81. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13269. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
Well-defined productivity-precipitation relationships of ecosystems are needed as benchmarks for the validation of land models used for future projections. The productivity-precipitation relationship may be studied in two ways: the spatial approach relates differences in productivity to those in precipitation among sites along a precipitation gradient (the spatial fit, with a steeper slope); the temporal approach relates interannual productivity changes to variation in precipitation within sites (the temporal fits, with flatter slopes). Precipitation-reduction experiments in natural ecosystems represent a complement to the fits, because they can reduce precipitation below the natural range and are thus well suited to study potential effects of climate drying. Here, we analyse the effects of dry treatments in eleven multiyear precipitation-manipulation experiments, focusing on changes in the temporal fit. We expected that structural changes in the dry treatments would occur in some experiments, thereby reducing the intercept of the temporal fit and displacing the productivity-precipitation relationship downward the spatial fit. The majority of experiments (72%) showed that dry treatments did not alter the temporal fit. This implies that current temporal fits are to be preferred over the spatial fit to benchmark land-model projections of productivity under future climate within the precipitation ranges covered by the experiments. Moreover, in two experiments, the intercept of the temporal fit unexpectedly increased due to mechanisms that reduced either water loss or nutrient loss. The expected decrease of the intercept was observed in only one experiment, and only when distinguishing between the late and the early phases of the experiment. This implies that we currently do not know at which precipitation-reduction level or at which experimental duration structural changes will start to alter ecosystem productivity. Our study highlights the need for experiments with multiple, including more extreme, dry treatments, to identify the precipitation boundaries within which the current temporal fits remain valid.
需要明确的生态系统生产力与降水关系,作为验证未来预测所用土地模型的基准。可以通过两种方式研究生产力与降水关系:空间方法将生产力差异与降水梯度上站点之间的降水差异相关联(空间拟合,斜率较陡);时间方法将年际生产力变化与站点内降水变化相关联(时间拟合,斜率较平坦)。自然生态系统中的降水减少实验是拟合的补充,因为它们可以将降水减少到自然范围以下,因此非常适合研究气候干燥的潜在影响。在这里,我们分析了 11 个多年降水操纵实验中的干旱处理的影响,重点研究了时间拟合的变化。我们预计,在一些实验中,干旱处理会发生结构变化,从而降低时间拟合的截距,并将生产力与降水关系向下推到空间拟合。大多数实验(72%)表明,干旱处理并没有改变时间拟合。这意味着,在实验所涵盖的降水范围内,当前的时间拟合比空间拟合更适合作为基准,用于预测未来气候下土地模型对生产力的预测。此外,在两个实验中,由于减少了水分或养分流失的机制,时间拟合的截距出人意料地增加了。仅在一个实验中观察到预期的截距下降,而且仅在区分实验的后期和早期阶段时才观察到。这意味着我们目前还不知道在哪个降水减少水平或在哪个实验持续时间内,结构变化将开始改变生态系统生产力。我们的研究强调需要进行多次实验,包括更极端的干旱处理,以确定当前时间拟合仍然有效的降水界限。