Rodríguez-Mansilla Juan, González-Sánchez Blanca, De Toro García Álvaro, Valera-Donoso Enrique, Garrido-Ardila Elisa María, Jiménez-Palomares María, González López-Arza María Victoria
J Tradit Chin Med. 2016 Feb;36(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(16)30001-2.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the literature about the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) on relieving pain and increasing range of motion (ROM) in individuals with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). METHODS: Papers published from January 2000 to January 2013 were identified through an electronic search in the databases MEDLINE, Dialnet, Cochrane Library Plus, Physiotherapy Evidence Data-base (PEDro) and Spanish Superior Council of Scientific Research (CSIC). The studies included were randomized controlled trials written in English and/or Spanish about the effectiveness of DN on pain and ROM in individuals with MPS. RESULTS: Out of 19 clinical trials that were potentially relevant, a total of 10 were included in the Meta-analysis. Regarding pain intensity reduction when measured before and immediately after the intervention, DN achieved improvement compared with the placebo treatment [d = - 0.49; 95% CI (- 3.21, 0.42)] and with the control group [d = - 9.13; 95% C (- 14.70, - 3.56)]. However, other treatments achieved better results on the same variable compared with DN, considering the measurements for pre-treatment and immediately after [d = 2.54; 95% CI (- 0.40, 5.48)], as well as the pre-treatment and after 3-4 weeks [d = 4.23; 95% CI (0.78, 7.68)]. DN showed a significantly increased ROM when measured before the intervention and immediately after, in comparison with the placebo [d = 2.00; 95% C (1.60, 2.41)]. However, other treatments achieved a significant better result regarding ROM when it was measured before the intervention and immediately after, as compared with DN [d = - 1.42; 95% CI (- 1.84, - 0.99)]. CONCLUSION: DN was less effective on decreasing pain comparing to the placebo group. Other treatments were more effective than DN on reducing pain after 3-4 weeks. However, on increasing ROM, DN was more effective comparing to that of placebo group, but less than other treatments.
目的:总结有关干针疗法(DN)对缓解肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)患者疼痛及增加关节活动范围(ROM)有效性的文献。 方法:通过在MEDLINE、Dialnet、Cochrane图书馆升级版、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)和西班牙科学研究高级理事会(CSIC)等数据库中进行电子检索,确定2000年1月至2013年1月发表的论文。纳入的研究为用英文和/或西班牙文撰写的关于DN对MPS患者疼痛和ROM有效性的随机对照试验。 结果:在19项可能相关的临床试验中,共有10项纳入荟萃分析。关于干预前和干预后即刻测量的疼痛强度降低情况,与安慰剂治疗相比,DN有改善 [d = - 0.49;95%可信区间(- 3.21, 0.42)],与对照组相比也有改善 [d = - 9.13;95%可信区间(- 14.70, - 3.56)]。然而,考虑到治疗前和治疗后即刻的测量结果 [d = 2.54;95%可信区间(- 0.40, 5.48)],以及治疗前和3 - 4周后的测量结果 [d = 4.23;95%可信区间(0.78, 7.68)],与DN相比,其他治疗在同一变量上取得了更好的结果。与安慰剂相比,干预前和干预后即刻测量时,DN显示ROM显著增加 [d = 2.00;95%可信区间(1.60, 2.41)]。然而,与DN相比,干预前和干预后即刻测量ROM时,其他治疗取得了显著更好的结果 [d = - 1.42;95%可信区间(- 1.84, - 0.99)]。 结论:与安慰剂组相比,DN在减轻疼痛方面效果较差。3 - 4周后,其他治疗在减轻疼痛方面比DN更有效。然而,在增加ROM方面,与安慰剂组相比DN更有效,但不如其他治疗。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013-9
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018-6
Healthcare (Basel). 2022-9-24
J Clin Med. 2021-11-25