Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Division of Oral Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University, School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Craniofacial Pain Center, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University, School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Complement Ther Med. 2020 Mar;49:102297. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102297. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
Persistent head and neck myofascial pain is among the most frequently reported pain complaints featuring major variability in treatment approaches and perception of improvement. Acupuncture is one of the least invasive complimentary modalities that can optimize conventional treatment. The aim of this review was to determine the evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of localized persistent myofascial head and neck pain. Only randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library in addition to manual search. The main outcome measure was the comparison of the mean pain intensity score on VAS between acupuncture and sham-needling/no intervention groups. Safety data and adherence rate were also investigated. Six RCTs were identified with variable risk of bias. All included studies reported reduction in VAS pain intensity scores in the groups receiving acupuncture when compared to sham needling/no intervention. Meta-analysis, using a weighted mean difference as the effect estimate, included only 4 RCTs, revealed a 19.04 point difference in pain intensity between acupuncture and sham-needling/no intervention (95 %CI: -29.13 to -8.95). High levels of safety were demonstrated by the low rates of side effects/withdrawal. Inconsistency in reporting of outcomes was a major limitation. In conclusion, moderate-quality evidence suggests that acupuncture may be an effective and safe method in relieving persistent head and neck myofascial pain. Optimizing study designs and standardizing outcome measures are needed for future RCTs.
持续性头颈部肌筋膜疼痛是最常见的疼痛主诉之一,其治疗方法和改善效果的感知存在很大差异。针灸是一种侵入性最小的补充疗法,可以优化常规治疗。本综述旨在确定针灸治疗局部持续性肌筋膜头颈部疼痛的有效性证据。仅纳入随机对照临床试验(RCT)。检索了 PubMed、Ovid Medline、Embase、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library,并进行了手动检索。主要观察指标是比较针灸组和假针组/无干预组的 VAS 平均疼痛强度评分。还调查了安全性数据和依从率。确定了 6 项具有可变偏倚风险的 RCT。所有纳入的研究报告称,与假针组/无干预组相比,接受针灸治疗的组的 VAS 疼痛强度评分降低。使用加权均数差值作为效应估计值的荟萃分析仅包括 4 项 RCT,结果显示针灸组与假针组/无干预组之间的疼痛强度差异为 19.04 分(95 %CI:-29.13 至-8.95)。低副作用/退出率表明安全性高。结果报告不一致是主要限制。总之,中等质量的证据表明,针灸可能是缓解持续性头颈部肌筋膜疼痛的有效且安全的方法。需要优化研究设计并标准化结局测量,以进行未来的 RCT。