Gabriel Lucinda E K, Bailey Michael J, Bellomo Rinaldo, Stow Peter, Orford Neil, McGain Forbes, Santamaria John, Scheinkestel Carlos, Pilcher David V
Department of Intensive Care, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Crit Care Resusc. 2016 Mar;18(1):43-9.
The association between insurance status and outcome in critically ill patients is uncertain. We aimed to determine if there was an independent relationship between the presence or absence of compensable insurance status and mortality, after admission to the intensive care unit.
We performed a retrospective cohort study in five public hospitals in Victoria, comprising adult patients admitted to the ICU between 2007 and 2012. We obtained data on demographics, severity of illness, chronic health status, insurance category, length of stay (LOS) and mortality. We matched socio-economic indices (collected from the Australian Bureau of Statistics) to postcodes. The primary outcome measured was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU mortality, and ICU and hospital LOS, measured in days.
We studied 33 306 patients. Compensable patients comprised 21.2% of the study population (7046). Personal private insurance accounted for 13.4% (4451) and Transport Accident Commission insurance for 5.1% (1701) of compensable patients. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in publicly insured patients (13.4% v 10.6%, P < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, severity of illness, diagnosis and socio-economic status, being a compensable patient in a public hospital ICU was independently associated with a reduction in mortality (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80; P < 0.001).
Among ICU patients treated in public hospitals in Victoria, being a compensable patient appears to be independently associated with a reduction in mortality. Further studies are needed to confirm and validate these findings elsewhere in Australia.
危重症患者的保险状况与预后之间的关联尚不确定。我们旨在确定在入住重症监护病房后,可补偿保险状况的有无与死亡率之间是否存在独立关系。
我们在维多利亚州的五家公立医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2007年至2012年间入住重症监护病房的成年患者。我们获取了有关人口统计学特征、疾病严重程度、慢性健康状况、保险类别、住院时间(LOS)和死亡率的数据。我们将社会经济指数(从澳大利亚统计局收集)与邮政编码进行匹配。主要测量的结局是院内死亡率。次要结局是重症监护病房死亡率以及以天为单位测量的重症监护病房和医院住院时间。
我们研究了33306名患者。可补偿患者占研究人群的21.2%(7046人)。个人私人保险占可补偿患者的13.4%(4451人),交通事故委员会保险占5.1%(1701人)。未调整的情况下,公立保险患者的院内死亡率更高(13.4%对10.6%,P<0.0001)。在调整了年龄、疾病严重程度、诊断和社会经济状况后,在公立医院重症监护病房作为可补偿患者与死亡率降低独立相关(比值比,0.73;95%可信区间,0.65 - 0.80;P<0.001)。
在维多利亚州公立医院接受治疗的重症监护病房患者中,作为可补偿患者似乎与死亡率降低独立相关。需要进一步研究以在澳大利亚其他地方确认和验证这些发现。