Morris Lydia
Department of Sociology, University of Essex.
Br J Sociol. 2016 Mar;67(1):97-117. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12186.
This paper notes the contemporary emergence of 'morality' in both sociological argument and political rhetoric, and analyses its significance in relation to ongoing UK welfare reforms. It revisits the idea of 'moral economy' and identifies two strands in its contemporary application; that all economies depend on an internal moral schema, and that some external moral evaluation is desirable. UK welfare reform is analysed as an example of the former, with reference to three distinct orientations advanced in the work of Freeden (1996), Laclau (2014), and Lockwood (1996). In this light, the paper then considers challenges to the reform agenda, drawn from third sector and other public sources. It outlines the forms of argument present in these challenges, based respectively on rationality, legality, and morality, which together provide a basis for evaluation of the welfare reforms and for an alternative 'moral economy'.
本文指出了“道德”在当代社会学论证和政治修辞中的出现,并分析了其与英国正在进行的福利改革相关的意义。它重新审视了“道德经济”的概念,并确定了其当代应用中的两个方面:所有经济都依赖于内部道德体系,以及需要进行一些外部道德评价。以弗里登(1996年)、拉克劳(2014年)和洛克伍德(1996年)的著作中提出的三种不同取向为参考,分析了英国的福利改革作为前者的一个例子。有鉴于此,本文接着考虑了来自第三部门和其他公共来源对改革议程的挑战。它概述了这些挑战中存在的论证形式,分别基于合理性、合法性和道德性,这些共同为评估福利改革和替代“道德经济”提供了基础。