Chaney Mark A, Devin Roberts J, Wroblewski Kristen, Shahul Sajid, Gaudet Ross, Jeevanandam Valuvan
Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care.
Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):647-55. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
The method of protamine administration may influence adverse reactions. The authors investigated the effects of 3 different methods of protamine administration on cardiopulmonary function.
Prospective, randomized clinical study.
Single university hospital.
Human volunteer patients.
Ninety-five patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized prospectively into 3 groups. Group central vein control (CVC) and group central vein (CV) received protamine via a central vein over 10 minutes and 2 minutes, respectively. Group ascending aorta (AA) received protamine via the ascending aorta over 2 minutes. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed at 7 intraoperative time points, and pulmonary parameters were assessed at 4 intraoperative time points.
The groups were similar regarding preoperative demographics, intraoperative care, and baseline cardiopulmonary function. However, both the CVC and CV groups exhibited decreased blood pressure and impaired pulmonary oxygenation after protamine administration; these changes were not observed in the AA group. Within-group changes in mean arterial blood pressure after protamine administration were significant in the AA group (mean increase 6.5 mmHg; p = 0.01) but not in the CVC (mean decrease 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.13) or CV (mean decrease 4.3 mmHg, p = 0.14) groups. Within-group changes in arterial oxygenation after protamine administration were significant in the CVC (mean decrease 85 mmHg; p<0.001) and CV (mean decrease 47 mmHg; p = 0.009) groups but not in the AA group (mean decrease 8 mmHg; p = 0.82).
The results indicated that administration of protamine via the ascending aorta may be the preferred route. The potential ability of administering protamine via the ascending aorta to prevent cardiopulmonary instability in patients undergoing cardiac surgery deserves further clinical investigation.
鱼精蛋白的给药方法可能会影响不良反应。作者研究了3种不同的鱼精蛋白给药方法对心肺功能的影响。
前瞻性随机临床研究。
单所大学医院。
人类志愿者患者。
95例接受心脏手术的患者被前瞻性随机分为3组。中心静脉对照组(CVC)和中心静脉组(CV)分别通过中心静脉在10分钟和2分钟内输注鱼精蛋白。升主动脉组(AA)通过升主动脉在2分钟内输注鱼精蛋白。在术中7个时间点评估血流动力学参数,在术中4个时间点评估肺参数。
三组患者在术前人口统计学、术中护理及基线心肺功能方面相似。然而,CVC组和CV组在输注鱼精蛋白后均出现血压下降和肺氧合受损;AA组未观察到这些变化。AA组在输注鱼精蛋白后平均动脉血压的组内变化显著(平均升高6.5 mmHg;p = 0.01),而CVC组(平均降低3.1 mmHg,p = 0.13)和CV组(平均降低4.3 mmHg,p = 0.14)不显著。CVC组(平均降低85 mmHg;p<0.001)和CV组(平均降低47 mmHg;p = 0.009)在输注鱼精蛋白后动脉氧合的组内变化显著,而AA组不显著(平均降低8 mmHg;p = 0.82)。
结果表明,经升主动脉给药可能是首选途径。经升主动脉给药预防心脏手术患者心肺不稳定的潜在能力值得进一步临床研究。