Verma Vivek, Li Jinluan, Lin Chi
*Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE †Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;39(3):302-13. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000278.
The purpose of this review was to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) result in differential postoperative morbidity and mortality as compared with pancreatic tumor resection surgery alone. Using PRISMA guidelines and the PubMed search engine, we reviewed all prospective phase II trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CRT for pancreatic cancer that examined postoperative morbidities and mortalities. A total of 30 articles were identified, collated, and analyzed. Risks of postoperative complications vary based on trial. With surgery alone, the most common postoperative complications included delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (17% to 24%), pancreatic fistula (10% to 20%), anastomotic leaks (0% to 15%), postoperative bleeding (2% to 13%), and infections/sepsis (17% to 20%). With surgery alone, the mortality was <5%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed comparable fistula rates (3% to 4%), leaks (3% to 11%), infection (3% to 7%), with mortality 0% to 4% in all but 1 study. CRT for resectable/borderline resectable patients also showed comparable complication rates: DGE (6% to 15%), fistulas (2% to 3%), leaks (3% to 7%), bleeding/hemorrhage (2% to 13%), infections/sepsis (3% to 19%), with 9/13 studies showing a mortality of ≤4%. As compared with initially borderline/resectable tumors, CRT for initially unresectable tumors (despite less data) showed higher complication rates: DGE (13% to 33%), fistulas (3% to 25%), infections/sepsis (3% to 16%). However, the confounding factor of the potentially higher tumor burden as an associative agent remains. The only parameters slightly higher than historical surgery-only complication rates were leaks and bleeding/hemorrhage (13% to 20%). Mortality rates in these patients were consistently 0%, with 2 outliers. Hence, neoadjuvant chemotherapy/CRT is safe from a postoperative complication standpoint, without significant increases in complication rates compared with surgery alone. Resectable and borderline resectable patients have fewer complications as compared with unresectable patients, although data for the latter are lacking.
本综述的目的是评估新辅助化疗和放化疗(CRT)与单纯胰腺癌肿瘤切除手术相比,术后发病率和死亡率是否存在差异。我们使用PRISMA指南和PubMed搜索引擎,回顾了所有关于新辅助化疗和CRT用于胰腺癌且检查了术后发病率和死亡率的前瞻性II期试验。共识别、整理和分析了30篇文章。术后并发症的风险因试验而异。单纯手术时,最常见的术后并发症包括胃排空延迟(DGE)(17%至24%)、胰瘘(10%至20%)、吻合口漏(0%至15%)、术后出血(2%至13%)以及感染/脓毒症(17%至20%)。单纯手术时,死亡率<5%。新辅助化疗显示瘘发生率相当(约3%至4%)、漏发生率相当(3%至11%)、感染发生率相当(3%至7%),除1项研究外所有研究的死亡率为0%至4%。可切除/边界可切除患者的CRT也显示出相当的并发症发生率:DGE(6%至15%)、瘘(2%至3%)、漏(3%至7%)、出血(2%至13%)、感染/脓毒症(3%至19%),13项研究中有9项显示死亡率≤4%。与最初边界可切除/可切除肿瘤相比,最初不可切除肿瘤的CRT(尽管数据较少)显示出更高的并发症发生率:DGE(13%至33%)、瘘(3%至25%)、感染/脓毒症(3%至16%)。然而,作为关联因素的潜在更高肿瘤负荷这一混杂因素仍然存在。唯一略高于单纯手术历史并发症发生率的参数是漏和出血(13%至20%)。这些患者的死亡率始终为0%,有2个异常值。因此,从术后并发症角度来看,新辅助化疗/CRT是安全的,与单纯手术相比并发症发生率没有显著增加。与不可切除患者相比,可切除和边界可切除患者的并发症较少,尽管后者的数据不足。