Savage Christine L
Christine L. Savage, PhD, RN, CARN, FAAN, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Addict Nurs. 2016 Jan-Mar;27(1):47-50. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000111.
What's in a name? Because the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, no longer uses the terms dependence and abuse (American Psychiatric Association, 2013a), does the continued use of these terms impact how issues related to at-risk substance use are presented in the literature? The purpose of this review is to explore the implications of the continued use of the term substance abuse in the clinical literature through the review of three articles published in 2015 that used the term substance abuse in the title.
The use of the term substance abuse in the articles reviewed resulted in presenting a narrow focus on substance use disorders rather than the broader issues of harm that occur across the full continuum of substance use. In addition, the term "substance abuse" in one article lent itself to the use of pejorative language and stigmatization.
It is imperative that we stop using the term substance abuse in clinical articles, because it is no longer clinically relevant and presents a narrow focus of the risks associated with substance use.
名称有何意义?由于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册(第5版)》不再使用“依赖”和“滥用”这两个术语(美国精神病学协会,2013a),那么继续使用这些术语是否会影响文献中对有物质使用风险相关问题的呈现方式?本综述的目的是通过回顾2015年发表的三篇标题中使用了“物质滥用”一词的文章,探讨在临床文献中继续使用“物质滥用”一词的影响。
在所回顾的文章中,“物质滥用”一词的使用导致对物质使用障碍的关注较为狭隘,而非更广泛的、贯穿物质使用全连续体的危害问题。此外,一篇文章中的“物质滥用”一词容易导致使用贬损性语言和污名化。
我们必须停止在临床文章中使用“物质滥用”一词,因为它在临床上已不再相关,且对与物质使用相关风险的关注较为狭隘。