Waring Paul, Tie Jeanne, Maru Dipen, Karapetis Christos S
Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Biomarker Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 Jun;15(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
The use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is guided by the presence of activating point mutations in codons 12, 13, 59, 61, 117, and 146 of the KRAS and NRAS genes in the primary tumor. Although these mutations have been incorporated into the prescribing information for both cetuximab and panitumumab, highlighted in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, and routinely tested, a number of controversial issues and unanswered questions related to these mutations and their clinical significance remain. In the present review, we explored the contradictory data related to the prognostic value of KRAS mutations, the reported frequent discordance of KRAS mutations, and the reported nonequivalence of some of these mutations. We also considered the issues related to incorporating additional mutations into the already accredited and approved assays and the challenges created by changing an assay's analytical and clinical limits of detection. We also discuss the lack of biologic data supporting the pathogenicity of newly described clinically actionable mutations and explore the uncertainty regarding the clinical significance of low-frequency mutations, highlighting the importance of correcting allele frequencies for tumor purity. We also considered the importance of distinguishing the significance of low-frequency RAS mutations in tumors previously not treated or treated with anti-EGFR therapies and explore new technologies capable of detecting emerging polyclonal RAS mutations that appear to confer drug resistance.
在转移性结直肠癌患者中,抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)单克隆抗体疗法的应用取决于原发肿瘤中KRAS和NRAS基因第12、13、59、61、117和146密码子处激活点突变的存在情况。尽管这些突变已被纳入西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗的处方信息中,在《美国国立综合癌症网络指南》中也有强调,并且常规进行检测,但与这些突变及其临床意义相关的一些有争议的问题和未解决的疑问仍然存在。在本综述中,我们探讨了与KRAS突变预后价值相关的矛盾数据、所报道的KRAS突变频繁不一致情况以及所报道的其中一些突变的不等效性。我们还考虑了将其他突变纳入已获认可和批准的检测方法相关的问题,以及改变检测方法的分析和临床检测限所带来的挑战。我们还讨论了缺乏支持新描述的临床可操作突变致病性的生物学数据的情况,并探讨了低频突变临床意义的不确定性,强调校正肿瘤纯度的等位基因频率的重要性。我们还考虑了区分未接受过抗EGFR治疗或接受过抗EGFR治疗的肿瘤中低频RAS突变意义的重要性,并探索能够检测似乎赋予耐药性的新出现的多克隆RAS突变的新技术。