Grover Sandeep, Bhadada Sanjay, Kate Natasha, Sarkar Siddharth, Bhansali Anil, Avasthi Ajit, Sharma Sunil, Goel Rashi
Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):32-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.173776.
To assess the coping strategies and the relationship of coping with subjective burden and positive caregiving consequences as perceived by the caregivers of children and adolescents with Type-1 diabetes.
Cross-sectional assessment.
Outpatient of Endocrinology Department.
Forty-one parents of children and adolescents with Type-1 diabetes.
Ways of coping checklist (WCC), involvement evaluation questionnaire (IEQ) and scale for assessment of positive aspects of caregiving experience (scale for positive aspects of caregiving experience) to study the coping, burden and positive aspects of caregiving respectively.
On WCC, the highest score was obtained for seeking social support, followed by planful problem-solving. More frequent use of coping strategies of confrontation and escape-avoidance was associated with significantly higher score on the tension domain of IEQ. Those who more frequently used problem-solving and distancing had significantly higher scores on worrying-urging-I domain of IEQ. supervision domain of IEQ was associated with more frequent use of confrontation, self-control, social support, escape-avoidance and positive reappraisal. More frequent use of distancing and problem-solving were associated with lower caregiving personal gains. More frequent use of problem-solving was associated with higher caregiver satisfaction and lower scores in the domain of self-esteem and social aspects of caring.
Caregivers of patients with Type-1 diabetes predominantly use adaptive coping strategies. Higher use of certain coping strategies is associated with negative and positive caregiving consequences.
评估1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的照顾者所采用的应对策略,以及应对方式与主观负担和积极照护结果之间的关系。
横断面评估。
内分泌科门诊。
41名1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的父母。
应对方式清单(WCC)、参与度评估问卷(IEQ)和照顾经历积极方面评估量表(照顾经历积极方面量表),分别用于研究应对方式、负担和照顾的积极方面。
在WCC上,寻求社会支持得分最高,其次是有计划地解决问题。更多地使用对抗和逃避-回避应对策略与IEQ紧张领域得分显著较高相关。那些更频繁使用解决问题和疏离策略的人在IEQ担忧-催促-I领域得分显著较高。IEQ监督领域与更频繁地使用对抗、自我控制、社会支持、逃避-回避和积极重新评价相关。更多地使用疏离和解决问题策略与较低的照顾个人收获相关。更多地使用解决问题策略与较高的照顾者满意度以及在自尊和照顾社会方面领域较低得分相关。
1型糖尿病患者的照顾者主要使用适应性应对策略。某些应对策略的较高使用频率与消极和积极的照护结果相关。