Suppr超能文献

[前肾上腺髓质素在脓毒症早期诊断中的价值]

[The value of pro-adrenomedullin in early diagnosis of sepsis].

作者信息

Yan Li, Cailan Lu, Hong Liu, Zheng Liu, Wei Dou

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Sep;27(9):739-42.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the early diagnostic value of pro-adrenomedullin (pro-ADM) in sepsis.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted. Eighty-two patients with acute infection admitted to Department of Emergency of Shanxi Medical University Second Hospital from April 2013 to March 2014 were enrolled. According to the diagnostic criteria of sepsis, the patients with acute infection were divided into ordinary infection group [infection without systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), n = 25] and sepsis group (infection combined with SIRS, n = 57). According to degree of severity of sepsis, the latter group was subdivided into three subgroups: sepsis group (n = 22), severe sepsis group (n = 27) and septic shock group (n = 8). Twenty-four healthy persons were included to serve as healthy control group. The venous blood from all the research objects in hospital was collected within 24 hours. The levels of pro-ADM and procalcitonin ( PCT ) were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II ) score was recorded. The relationship between pro-ADM and PCT and also APACHE II score was analyzed with Pearson correlation analysis. The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) of pro-ADM and PCT were used to evaluate the diagnostic acuity of sepsis.

RESULTS

The plasma levels of pro-ADM, PCT and APACHE II score in sepsis group were significantly higher than those in ordinary infection group and healthy control group [pro-ADM (ng/L): 66.69 ± 1.73 vs. 53.43 ± 2.70, 45.87 ± 1.43; PCT (ng/L): 1 336.49 ± 40.26 vs. 1 083.09 ± 47.99, 959.04 ± 37.53; APACHE II score: 14.60 ± 0.81 vs. 8.10 ± 1.14, 3.00 ± 1.15, all P < 0.01]. With the aggravation of sepsis, the levels of pro-ADM, PCT and APACHE II score were gradually increased, and there were significant differences among sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock groups [pro-ADM (ng/L): 64.91 ± 2.50, 73.56 ± 2.80, 84.67 ± 4.52; PCT (ng/L): 1 152.65 ± 48.62, 1 233.93 ± 63.06, 1 475.71 ± 109.93; APACHE II score: 12.91 ± 1.15, 14.55 ± 1.14, 19.37 ± 2.40, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01]. Pearson correlation analysis results showed that the level of pro-ADM was positively related with PCT (r = 0.473, P = 0.006), and it was also positively correlated with APACHE II score (r = 0.707, P = 0.008). ROC curve analysis showed that area under the ROC curve (AUC) of pro-ADM for diagnosis of sepsis was 0.823 (P = 0.003). When the cutoff value was 59.40 ng/L, the sensitivity was 80.7%, the specificity was 68.0%, the positive predictive value was 85.2%, and the negative predictive value was 60.7%. AUC of the PCT for diagnosis of sepsis was 0.653 (P = 0.043). When the cutoff value was 1 194.67 ng/L, the sensitivity was 68.4%, the specificity was 64.0%, the positive predictive value was 81.8%, and the negative predictive value was 44.7%. It was proved that the pro-ADM had a higher diagnostic value for sepsis than PCT.

CONCLUSION

The plasma levels of pro-ADM can be used as an early indicator in diagnosis and severity evaluation and prognosis in patients with sepsis.

摘要

目的

探讨前肾上腺髓质素(pro-ADM)在脓毒症早期诊断中的价值。

方法

进行一项前瞻性研究。选取2013年4月至2014年3月在山西医科大学第二医院急诊科收治的82例急性感染患者。根据脓毒症诊断标准,将急性感染患者分为普通感染组(无全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的感染,n = 25)和脓毒症组(感染合并SIRS,n = 57)。根据脓毒症严重程度,将后一组再细分为三个亚组:脓毒症组(n = 22)、严重脓毒症组(n = 27)和感染性休克组(n = 8)。纳入24名健康人作为健康对照组。所有研究对象均在入院24小时内采集静脉血。采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法测定pro-ADM和降钙素原(PCT)水平,并记录急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)。采用Pearson相关分析分析pro-ADM与PCT以及APACHE II评分之间的关系。采用pro-ADM和PCT的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估脓毒症的诊断准确性。

结果

脓毒症组血浆pro-ADM、PCT水平及APACHE II评分均显著高于普通感染组和健康对照组[pro-ADM(ng/L):66.69±1.73 vs. 53.43±2.70,45.87±1.43;PCT(ng/L):1 336.49±40.26 vs. 1 083.09±47.99,959.04±37.53;APACHE II评分:14.60±0.81 vs. 8.10±1.14,3.00±1.15,均P < 0.01]。随着脓毒症病情加重,pro-ADM、PCT水平及APACHE II评分逐渐升高,脓毒症组、严重脓毒症组和感染性休克组之间差异有统计学意义[pro-ADM(ng/L):64.91±2.50,73.56±2.80,84.67±4.52;PCT(ng/L):1 152.65±48.62,1 233.93±63.06,1 475.71±109.93;APACHE II评分:12.91±1.15,14.55±1.14,19.37±2.40,P < 0.05或P < 0.01]。Pearson相关分析结果显示,pro-ADM水平与PCT呈正相关(r = 0.473,P = 0.006),与APACHE II评分也呈正相关(r = 0.707,P = 0.008)。ROC曲线分析显示,pro-ADM诊断脓毒症的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.823(P = 0.003)。当截断值为59.40 ng/L时,灵敏度为80.7%,特异度为68.0%,阳性预测值为85.2%,阴性预测值为60.7%。PCT诊断脓毒症的AUC为0.653(P = 0.043)。当截断值为1 194.67 ng/L时,灵敏度为68.4%,特异度为64.0%,阳性预测值为81.8%,阴性预测值为44.7%。证实pro-ADM对脓毒症的诊断价值高于PCT。

结论

血浆pro-ADM水平可作为脓毒症患者诊断、严重程度评估及预后的早期指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验