• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术中母婴皮肤接触的风险与益处——一项回顾性队列研究

Risks and benefits of the skin-to-skin cesarean section - a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Posthuma Selina, Korteweg Fleurisca J, van der Ploeg J Marinus, de Boer Hans D, Buiter Hannah D, van der Ham David P

机构信息

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

b Department of Anesthesiology and Pain medicine , and.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jan;30(2):159-163. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1163683. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

DOI:10.3109/14767058.2016.1163683
PMID:26955857
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes after conventional cesarean section (CS) versus a "natural" or "skin-to-skin" cesarean section (SSCS).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of women who underwent a SSCS (01-2013 until 12-2013) compared to conventional CS (08-2011 to 08-2012). CS before 37 weeks, under general anesthesia and in case of fetal distress were excluded. Main outcome measures were maternal blood loss, post-operative infection and admission; neonatal infection and admission; procedural outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed 285 (44%) women in the SSCS-group and 365 (56%) in the conventional CS-group. There were no significant differences in surgical site infection (2.1% versus 1.6%; RR 1.1; 95%CI 0.64-2.0), or other maternal outcomes. Fewer neonates born after SSCS were admitted to the pediatric ward (9.5% versus 18%; RR 0.58; 95%CI 0.41-0.80) and fewer neonates had a suspected neonatal infection (2.0% versus 7.3%; RR 0.40; 95%CI 0.19-0.83). No differences were observed for other outcomes. Mean operation time was 4m42s longer in the SSCS-group compared to the conventional CS-group (58m versus 53m; 95%CI 2m44s-6m40s). Mean recovery time was 14m46s shorter (114m versus 129m; 95%CI 3m20s-26m).

CONCLUSION

Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were not increased after skin-to-skin cesarean compared to conventional cesarean delivery.

摘要

目的

比较传统剖宫产(CS)与“自然”或“母婴皮肤接触”剖宫产(SSCS)后的母婴结局。

方法

对2013年1月至2013年12月接受SSCS的女性与2011年8月至2012年8月接受传统CS的女性进行回顾性队列研究。排除37周前剖宫产、全身麻醉下剖宫产及胎儿窘迫情况下的剖宫产。主要结局指标包括产妇失血、术后感染及住院情况;新生儿感染及住院情况;手术结局。

结果

我们分析了SSCS组中的285名(44%)女性和传统CS组中的365名(56%)女性。手术部位感染(2.1%对1.6%;相对危险度1.1;95%置信区间0.64 - 2.0)或其他产妇结局方面无显著差异。SSCS后出生的新生儿入住儿科病房的较少(9.5%对18%;相对危险度0.58;95%置信区间0.41 - 0.80),疑似新生儿感染的也较少(2.0%对7.3%;相对危险度0.40;95%置信区间0.19 - 0.83)。其他结局未观察到差异。与传统CS组相比,SSCS组平均手术时间长4分42秒(58分钟对53分钟;95%置信区间2分44秒 - 6分40秒)。平均恢复时间短14分46秒(114分钟对129分钟;95%置信区间3分20秒 - 26分钟)。

结论

与传统剖宫产相比,母婴皮肤接触剖宫产术后母婴不良结局并未增加。

相似文献

1
Risks and benefits of the skin-to-skin cesarean section - a retrospective cohort study.剖宫产术中母婴皮肤接触的风险与益处——一项回顾性队列研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jan;30(2):159-163. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1163683. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
2
Short report: Post-operative wound infections after the gentle caesarean section.简短报告:温和剖宫产术后的伤口感染。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Oct;241:131-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.选择性剖宫产在 38 周与 39 周的比较:一项随机对照试验中的新生儿和产妇结局。
BJOG. 2013 Aug;120(9):1123-32. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12278. Epub 2013 May 20.
4
Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies.先前的剖宫产术与未来妊娠中产妇并发症和不良新生儿结局的风险。
J Perinatol. 2009 Nov;29(11):726-30. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.108. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
5
Iron deficiency anemia at admission for labor and delivery is associated with an increased risk for Cesarean section and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.分娩入院时的缺铁性贫血与剖宫产风险增加以及孕产妇和新生儿不良结局相关。
Transfusion. 2015 Dec;55(12):2799-806. doi: 10.1111/trf.13252. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
6
Effects of propofol versus thiopental on Apgar scores in newborns and peri-operative outcomes of women undergoing emergency cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠对新生儿阿氏评分及急诊剖宫产妇女围手术期结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Apr 29;15:63. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0044-6.
7
Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births.臀位分娩的分娩方式与妊娠结局。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Feb;285(2):297-303. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1956-0. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
8
[Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes].[高危妊娠及分娩方式与母婴结局的关联]
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014 Feb;36(2):65-71.
9
Maternal and fetal outcomes following unplanned conversion to general anesthetic at elective cesarean section.择期剖宫产术中意外转为全身麻醉后的母婴结局
J Perinatol. 2015 Sep;35(9):695-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.62. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
10
Risks associated with subsequent pregnancy after one caesarean section: A prospective cohort study in a Nigerian obstetric population.剖宫产术后再次妊娠的相关风险:尼日利亚产科人群的一项前瞻性队列研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Jul-Aug;17(4):442-8. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.134035.

引用本文的文献

1
Early essential newborn care for cesarean section newborns in China: study protocol for a multi-centered randomized controlled trial.中国剖宫产新生儿早期基本保健:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Aug 19;23(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06615-z.
2
Early essential newborn care is associated with improved newborn outcomes following caesarean section births in a tertiary hospital in Da Nang, Vietnam: a pre/post-intervention study.早期基本新生儿护理与越南岘港一家三级医院剖宫产新生儿结局改善相关:一项干预前后研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jul;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001089.
3
Neonatal Safety of Elective Family-Centered Caesarean Sections: A Cohort Study.
择期家庭式剖宫产的新生儿安全性:一项队列研究
Front Pediatr. 2018 Feb 12;6:20. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00020. eCollection 2018.
4
The Maternal Infant Microbiome: Considerations for Labor and Birth.母婴微生物群:分娩相关考量
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):318-325. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000373.