Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚地区网络中出生于外地的极早产儿的神经发育障碍风险。

Risk of neurodevelopmental impairment for outborn extremely preterm infants in an Australian regional network.

作者信息

Mahoney Kate, Bajuk Barbara, Oei Julee, Lui Kei, Abdel-Latif Mohamed E

机构信息

a Medical School, College of Medicine, Biology & Environment, Australian National University , Acton, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory , Australia.

b Neonatal Intensive Care Units' (NICUS) Data Collection, NSW Pregnancy and Newborn Services Network (PSN), Sydney Children's Hospitals Network , NSW , Australia.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jan;30(1):96-102. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1163675. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2-3 years in extremely premature outborn and inborn infants.

DESIGN

Population-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Geographically defined area of New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) served by a network of 10 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

PATIENTS

All premature infants <29 weeks gestation born between 1998 and 2004 in the setting.

INTERVENTION

At 2-3 years, corrected age, 1473 children were assessed with either the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales (GMDS) or the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-II).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Moderate/severe functional disability (FD) defined as: developmental delay (GMDS general quotient (GQ) or BSID-II mental developmental index (MDI)) > 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean; cerebral palsy (CP) requiring aids; sensorineural or conductive deafness (requiring amplification); or bilateral blindness (visual acuity <6/60 in better eye).

RESULTS

At 2-3 years, moderate/severe functional disability does not appear to be significantly different between outborn and inborn infants (adjusted OR 0.782; 95% CI 0.424-1.443). However, there were a significant number of outborn infants lost to follow up (23.3% versus 42.9%).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, at 2-3 years follow up neurodevelopmental outcome does not appear to be significantly different between outborn and inborn infants. These results should be interpreted with caution given the limitation of this study.

摘要

目的

比较出生时为极早产儿的院外出生儿与院内出生儿在2至3岁时的神经发育结局。

设计

基于人群的回顾性队列研究。

地点

新南威尔士州(NSW)和澳大利亚首都地区(ACT)的地理界定区域,由10个新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)网络提供服务。

研究对象

1998年至2004年在该地区出生的所有孕周小于29周的早产儿。

干预措施

在2至3岁矫正年龄时,对1473名儿童使用格里菲斯心理发育量表(GMDS)或贝利婴儿发育量表(BSID-II)进行评估。

主要结局指标

中度/重度功能残疾(FD)定义为:发育迟缓(GMDS总商数(GQ)或BSID-II心理发育指数(MDI))比均值低2个标准差(SD)以上;需要辅助器具的脑瘫(CP);感音神经性或传导性耳聋(需要放大设备);或双眼失明(较好眼视力<6/60)。

结果

在2至3岁时,院外出生儿与院内出生儿的中度/重度功能残疾情况似乎无显著差异(校正比值比0.782;95%置信区间0.424 - 1.443)。然而,有相当数量的院外出生儿失访(23.3%对42.9%)。

结论

在该队列中,随访至2至3岁时,院外出生儿与院内出生儿的神经发育结局似乎无显著差异。鉴于本研究的局限性,对这些结果应谨慎解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验