• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单心室姑息治疗后顽固性胸腔积液的膈肌开窗术

Diaphragmatic Fenestration for Resistant Pleural Effusions After Univentricular Palliation.

作者信息

Talwar Sachin, Das Anupam, Choudhary Shiv Kumar, Airan Balram

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2016 Mar;7(2):146-51. doi: 10.1177/2150135115627651.

DOI:10.1177/2150135115627651
PMID:26957396
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Persistent pleural effusions are a major source of morbidity after univentricular repair. These are often refractory to conventional conservative therapy. We adopted a strategy of diaphragmatic fenestration (DF) in such patients and report the results.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and 2014, we performed DF in 12 patients using an original technique that was first described by us. The medical records of all these patients were studied. Preoperative characteristics, amount and duration of effusions, and time to removal of chest tubes following DF were studied.

RESULTS

Mean age was 101 ± 57.9 months (range: 38-180 months), and mean body weight was 18.8 ± 5.8 kg (range: 11-28 kg). Five had a bidirectional Glenn, four had lateral tunnel Fontan, and three had an extracardiac Fontan as initial procedure. The average pleural drainage prior to DF was 352.5 ± 152 mL/24 h (18.75 mL/kg/24 h) for a median period of 33 days (bidirectional Glenn 216 ± 85 mL/24 h [16.5 mL/kg/24 h] for 30 days and total cavopulmonary connection 450 ± 104 mL/24 h [22.5 mL/kg/24 h] for 36 days). All patients underwent DF. Additionally, five patients underwent thoracic duct ligation on the left side. Postoperative chest drainage after DF was 25 mL/d for a median of 4 days, and the chest tubes could be removed in a median of 5.5 days (mean 7 days). There were no complications related to DF.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with persistent pleural effusions following univentricular palliation, DF is an attractive option when conventional therapies have failed. This original technique of DF is simple, reproducible, cost-effective, and free of any known complications.

摘要

目的

持续性胸腔积液是单心室修复术后发病的主要原因。这些积液通常对传统保守治疗无效。我们在此类患者中采用了膈开窗术(DF)并报告结果。

方法

2002年1月至2014年期间,我们采用首次由我们描述的原始技术对12例患者进行了DF。研究了所有这些患者的病历。研究了术前特征、积液量和持续时间以及DF后拔除胸管的时间。

结果

平均年龄为101±57.9个月(范围:38 - 180个月),平均体重为18.8±5.8千克(范围:11 - 28千克)。5例患者最初接受了双向格林分流术,4例接受了侧隧道式Fontan手术,3例接受了心外Fontan手术。DF前平均胸腔引流量为352.5±152毫升/24小时(18.75毫升/千克/24小时),中位时间为33天(双向格林分流术为216±85毫升/24小时[16.5毫升/千克/24小时],持续30天;全腔肺连接术为450±104毫升/24小时[22.5毫升/千克/24小时],持续36天)。所有患者均接受了DF。此外,5例患者接受了左侧胸导管结扎术。DF后术后胸腔引流量为25毫升/天,中位时间为4天,胸管中位拔除时间为5.5天(平均7天)。没有与DF相关的并发症。

结论

对于单心室姑息治疗后持续性胸腔积液的患者,当传统治疗失败时,DF是一个有吸引力的选择。这种DF的原始技术简单、可重复、具有成本效益且无任何已知并发症。

相似文献

1
Diaphragmatic Fenestration for Resistant Pleural Effusions After Univentricular Palliation.单心室姑息治疗后顽固性胸腔积液的膈肌开窗术
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2016 Mar;7(2):146-51. doi: 10.1177/2150135115627651.
2
Diaphragmatic fenestration for resistant pleural effusions after univentricular repair.单心室修复术后难治性胸腔积液的膈肌开窗术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Sep;74(3):931-2. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03672-x.
3
Risk factors for persistent pleural effusions after the extracardiac Fontan procedure.心外Fontan手术后持续性胸腔积液的危险因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jun;127(6):1664-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.09.011.
4
Omission of a prior Glenn anastomosis is a risk factor for prolonged pleural drainage after the fenestrated extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure.未进行先前的格林分流术是开窗式心外管道Fontan手术后胸腔引流时间延长的一个危险因素。
J Card Surg. 2011 Sep;26(5):509-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01291.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
5
Diaphragmatic fenestration for refractory chylothorax after congenital cardiac surgery in infants.婴儿先天性心脏手术后难治性乳糜胸的横膈开窗术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Dec;154(6):2062-2068. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
6
Factors influencing pleural effusion after Fontan operation: an analysis with 95 patients.影响Fontan手术后胸腔积液的因素:95例患者的分析
Chin Med Sci J. 2010 Mar;25(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/s1001-9294(10)60018-1.
7
Blake drains: a novel method of chest drainage after extracardiac fontan operation with autologous pericardium.体外循环心外管道Fontan 手术后应用自体心包行 Blake 引流:一种新的胸腔引流方法。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;94(4):1289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.077.
8
Factors influencing perioperative morbidity during palliation of the univentricular heart.影响单心室心脏姑息治疗围手术期发病率的因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Dec;60(6 Suppl):S550-3. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00769-5.
9
Reduced pleural drainage, length of stay, and readmissions using a modified Fontan management protocol.采用改良 Fontan 管理方案减少胸腔引流、住院时间和再入院率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):481-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.042. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
10
Bidirectional Glenn and antegrade pulmonary blood flow: temporary or definitive palliation?双向格林分流术和顺行性肺血流:临时姑息治疗还是确定性姑息治疗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1389-95; discussion 1395-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.01.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Is simultaneous diaphragmatic plication at Fontan completion beneficial?在Fontan手术完成时同期行膈折叠术是否有益?
Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):387-388. doi: 10.4103/apc.apc_147_23. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
A prospective study of risk factors associated with persistent pleural effusion after total cavopulmonary connection with special reference to serum cortisol level.一项关于全腔肺连接术后持续性胸腔积液相关危险因素的前瞻性研究,特别提及血清皮质醇水平。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;34(3):345-354. doi: 10.1007/s12055-017-0617-8. Epub 2017 Dec 8.